Show simple item record

Does Market Liberalisation Reduce Gender Discrimination? Econometric Evidence from Hungary, 1986—1998

dc.contributor.authorJolliffe, Deanen_US
dc.contributor.authorCampos, Nauro F.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-08-01T16:14:20Z
dc.date.available2006-08-01T16:14:20Z
dc.date.issued2004-04-01en_US
dc.identifier.otherRePEc:wdi:papers:2004-678en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/40064en_US
dc.description.abstractAn alleged achievement of socialism was gender equality in the labour market. Has its collapse shattered this accomplishment? The theoretical literature and attendant empirical evidence are inconclusive. Using data for 2.9 million wage earners in Hungary we find that the male-female difference in log wages declined from 0.31 to 0.19 between 1986 and 1998 and that this is largely explained by a matching decline in “Oaxaca's discrimination,” suggesting extraordinary improvement of women’s relative situation. Further, we find that variation over time in the wage gaps is associated with public and large firms having progressively smaller gaps than their counterparts.en_US
dc.format.extent79446 bytes
dc.format.extent3151 bytes
dc.format.extent1004987 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries678en_US
dc.subjectHungary, Transition, Discrimination, Gender, Wage Gap, Educationen_US
dc.subject.otherI2, J16, P3en_US
dc.titleDoes Market Liberalisation Reduce Gender Discrimination? Econometric Evidence from Hungary, 1986—1998en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/40064/3/wp678.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameWilliam Davidson Institute (WDI) - Working Papers


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.