Show simple item record

An Analysis of Gender Wage Differentials in Russia from 1996-2002

dc.contributor.authorHansberry, Ritaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-08-01T16:08:16Z
dc.date.available2006-08-01T16:08:16Z
dc.date.issued2004-09-01en_US
dc.identifier.otherRePEc:wdi:papers:2004-720en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/40106en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper examined the male-female differentials in hourly earnings in Russia from 1996 to 2002. The gender wage gap did not alter significantly in the earlier years, a period characterized by economic instability, but as the economy recovered, the differential in earnings increased initially. This trend reversed in 2002 and while the gender wage gap in mean earnings fell to its previous level the differential increased at the lower percentiles. Throughout all years, most of the gender wage differential is accounted for by differences in rewards rather than differences in observable characteristics. Occupational segregation continues to be a salient feature of the labor market with women clustered in professional, clerical and service occupations while men are more predominantly employed in blue-collar jobs.en_US
dc.format.extent63191 bytes
dc.format.extent3151 bytes
dc.format.extent311352 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries720en_US
dc.subjectRussia, Economic Transition, Gender Wage Gap, Occupational Segregationen_US
dc.subject.otherJ16, J31, P31en_US
dc.titleAn Analysis of Gender Wage Differentials in Russia from 1996-2002en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/40106/3/wp720.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameWilliam Davidson Institute (WDI) - Working Papers


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.