AN ANALYSIS OF THE U.S.-SACU FTA NEGOTIATIONS
dc.contributor.author | Brown, Drusilla K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kiyota, Kozo | |
dc.contributor.author | Stern, Robert M. | |
dc.date | 2006-05 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-08-17T14:35:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-08-17T14:35:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006-08-17T14:35:55Z | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/41235 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper analyzes the potential economic effects of bilateral negotiations for an FTA between the United States and the Southern African Customs Union (SACU). The U.S.-SACU FTA bilateral negotiations were initiated in June 2003. But following a number of official meetings, the negotiations were deadlocked over a series of issues of concern to the SACU. The bilateral FTA negotiations have now been replaced by an effort to negotiate a framework agreement covering trade and investment issues and possibly a bilateral FTA at some future time. To determine whether a bilateral FTA might be in the SACU members’ interests, we use the Michigan Model of World Production and Trade to assess the welfare and other economic effects of a bilateral FTA. For modeling purposes, the focus is on the effects of the bilateral removal of trade barriers, which lend themselves most readily to quantification. The conclusion is that the welfare benefits of a bilateral FTA are rather small in both absolute and relative terms, and that the non-trade and dynamic benefits of the SACU FTA are unlikely to alter these results significantly. To provide a broader perspective on the potential economic effects of a U.S.-SACU FTA, the model is also used to calculate the effects of unilateral tariff removal and global free trade. It is shown that unilateral free trade would result in much larger increases in economic welfare for the United States and SACU as compared to the FTA bilateral trade liberalization. The effects of global (multilateral) free trade are shown to be greater for the United States and SACU as compared to both the bilateral FTA liberalization and unilateral tariff removal. The results suggest accordingly that the interests of the global trading community, including the United States and SACU, could be better served by unilateral and especially multilateral liberalization rather than a bilateral FTA. | en |
dc.format.extent | 161105 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 17 | en |
dc.subject | Free Trade Agreements | en |
dc.subject | Unilateral Liberalization | en |
dc.subject | Multilateral Liberalization | en |
dc.subject.other | F10 | en |
dc.subject.other | F13 | en |
dc.subject.other | F15 | en |
dc.title | AN ANALYSIS OF THE U.S.-SACU FTA NEGOTIATIONS | en |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | International Policy Center (IPC); Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy | en |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Tufts University | en |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Yokohama National University | en |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/41235/1/IPC-working-paper-017-BrownKiyotaStern.pdf | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | International Policy Center (IPC) - Working Paper Series |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.