Show simple item record

Effects of Electrode Configuration and Stimulus Level on Rate and Level Discrimination with Cochlear Implants

dc.contributor.authorMorris, Deborah J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T19:11:30Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T19:11:30Z
dc.date.issued2000-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationMorris, Deborah J.; (2000). "Effects of Electrode Configuration and Stimulus Level on Rate and Level Discrimination with Cochlear Implants." Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 1(3): 211-223. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/41377>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1525-3961en_US
dc.identifier.issn1438-7573en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/41377
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=11545227&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractRecent studies have demonstrated that speech perception with cochlear implants can be significantly affected by electrode configuration. Contrary to expectations, broader configurations (monopolar or broad bipolar) produced equal or better speech recognition compared with narrower configurations (narrow bipolar or common ground). One hypothesis that would account for these results is that broader configurations excite larger populations of neurons providing a more robust representation of information on each channel of the prosthesis. It is known that the number of neurons excited by an electrical stimulus increases considerably as the stimulus level increases. Furthermore, many types of discrimination improve as a function of stimulus level. If the discrimination improvements seen with increasing stimulus level are due to increasing the size of the neural population carrying the signal, and if broadening the electrode configuration also increases the size of the activated neural population, then one would expect level and electrode configuration to affect discrimination in similar ways. To test this hypothesis, we studied several types of discrimination as a function of level and electrode configuration in four nonhuman primates with cochlear implants. We tested electrode configurations that produced current fields ranging from very restricted (tripolar) to broad (parallel monopolar). For each configuration, pulse-rate discrimination, amplitude-modulation-frequency discrimination, and level discrimination were tested at current levels spanning much of the psychophysical dynamic range. Results showed large effects of current level on discrimination in many cases. However, effects of electrode configuration at comparable levels within the dynamic range were smaller or absent. Furthermore, the effect of level on discrimination was independent of electrode configuration in most cases even though the rate of spread of neural activation with level is expected to depend on electrode configuration. Possible interpretations of these results are that (1) the current level adjustments necessary to achieve comparable loudness for the various configurations significantly countered any effects of electrode configuration on the size of the activated neural population, or (2) the effects of level on discrimination do not result from its effects on the spatial extent of neural activation.en_US
dc.format.extent225275 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherNonhuman Primatesen_US
dc.subject.otherNeurobiologyen_US
dc.subject.otherNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherCochlear Implantsen_US
dc.subject.otherStimulus Levelen_US
dc.subject.otherIntensity Discriminationen_US
dc.subject.otherElectrode Configurationen_US
dc.subject.otherMedicine & Public Healthen_US
dc.subject.otherFrequency Discriminationen_US
dc.subject.otherOtorhinolaryngologyen_US
dc.titleEffects of Electrode Configuration and Stimulus Level on Rate and Level Discrimination with Cochlear Implantsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOtolaryngologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOtolaryngologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumKresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-0506, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid11545227en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/41377/1/10162_2000_Article_22.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s101620010022en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.