Show simple item record

White-tailed deer vary offspring sex-ratio according to maternal condition and age

dc.contributor.authorBurke, Russell L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBirch, James M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T19:27:09Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T19:27:09Z
dc.date.issued1995-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationBurke, Russell L.; Birch, James M.; (1995). "White-tailed deer vary offspring sex-ratio according to maternal condition and age." Ecological Research 10(3): 351-357. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/41616>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0912-3814en_US
dc.identifier.issn1440-1703en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/41616
dc.description.abstractWe tested two models of adaptive offspring sex-ratio that predict opposite optimal reproductive strategies for female white-tail deer ( Odocoileus virginianus ). Trivers and Willard's model predicts that does (females) in particularly good condition should produce sons, and Williams refined their model to make specific predictions about optimal offspring number/sex choices. Verme's model results in very different predictions because of very different assumptions about which sex of offspring can best benefit from high levels of maternal resources. We found clear support for the Trivers and Willard/Williams model when we analyzed data from road-killed does, and we furthermore question several of the assumptions of the Verme model.en_US
dc.format.extent603872 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlag; Ecological Society of Japanen_US
dc.subject.otherEvolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.otherEcologyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherForestryen_US
dc.subject.otherOptimality Modelen_US
dc.subject.otherReproductionen_US
dc.subject.otherPlant Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherBehavioural Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherZoologyen_US
dc.subject.otherAdaptationen_US
dc.titleWhite-tailed deer vary offspring sex-ratio according to maternal condition and ageen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMuseum of Zoology and Department of Biology, University of Michigan, 481091079, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMuseum of Zoology and Department of Biology, University of Michigan, 481091079, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, 48109-1115, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/41616/1/11284_2006_Article_BF02347861.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02347861en_US
dc.identifier.sourceEcological Researchen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.