Show simple item record

Assessment of gene copy number in the homosporous ferns Ceratopteris thalictroides and C. richardii ( Parkeriaceae ) by restriction fragment length polymorphisms

dc.contributor.authorPichersky, Eranen_US
dc.contributor.authorHickok, Leslie G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMcGrath, J. Mitchellen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T19:28:34Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T19:28:34Z
dc.date.issued1994-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationMcGrath, J. Mitchell; Hickok, Leslie G.; Pichersky, Eran; (1994). "Assessment of gene copy number in the homosporous ferns Ceratopteris thalictroides and C. richardii ( Parkeriaceae ) by restriction fragment length polymorphisms." Plant Systematics and Evolution 189 (3-4): 203-210. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/41638>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1615-6110en_US
dc.identifier.issn0378-2697en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/41638
dc.description.abstractHomosporous ferns are generally considered polyploid due to high chromosome numbers, but genetically diploid since the expression of isozymes is generally controlled by a single locus. Gene silencing over evolutionary time is one means by which this apparent contradiction can be explained. A prediction of this hypothesis is that silenced gene sequences still reside in the genomes of homosporous ferns. We examined the genomes of Ceratopteris richardii and C. thalictroides for sequences which are similar to expressed gene sequences. Genomic DNA blots hybridized with C. richardii cDNA clones showed that the majority of these clones detected multiple fragments, suggesting that most gene-like sequences are duplicated in Ceratopteris. Hybridization signal intensity often varied between fragments of the same size between accessions, sometimes dramatically, which indicates that not all sequences are equivalent, and may represent the products of silenced genes. Observed reciprocal differences in intensity could be due to reciprocally silenced genes. In addition, an unusual segregation pattern for one locus followed by one probe may indicate homeologous chromosome pairing and segregation.en_US
dc.format.extent896625 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherGene Silencingen_US
dc.subject.otherPlant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeographyen_US
dc.subject.otherParkeriaceaeen_US
dc.subject.otherCeratopterisen_US
dc.subject.otherPlant Anatomy/Developmenten_US
dc.subject.otherPlant Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherHomosporous Fernsen_US
dc.subject.otherC. Richardiien_US
dc.subject.otherGene Duplicationen_US
dc.subject.otherC. Thalictroidesen_US
dc.subject.otherPolyploidyen_US
dc.subject.otherCDNA Clonesen_US
dc.subject.otherPlant Ecologyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife Sciencesen_US
dc.titleAssessment of gene copy number in the homosporous ferns Ceratopteris thalictroides and C. richardii ( Parkeriaceae ) by restriction fragment length polymorphismsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biology, University of Michigan, 48109-1048, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Botany, University of Tennessee, 37996, Knoxville, TN, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, 1630 Linden Dr., 53706, Madison, WI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/41638/1/606_2004_Article_BF00939726.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00939726en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePlant Systematics and Evolutionen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.