Show simple item record

Conservation of biodiversity in coffee agroecosystems: a tri-taxa comparison in southern Mexico

dc.contributor.authorPerfecto, Ivetteen_US
dc.contributor.authorMas, Alexandreen_US
dc.contributor.authorDietsch, Thomasen_US
dc.contributor.authorVandermeer, John H.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T20:18:17Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T20:18:17Z
dc.date.issued2003-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationPerfecto, Ivette; Mas, Alexandre; Dietsch, Thomas; Vandermeer, John; (2003). "Conservation of biodiversity in coffee agroecosystems: a tri-taxa comparison in southern Mexico." Biodiversity and Conservation 12(6): 1239-1252. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42405>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0960-3115en_US
dc.identifier.issn1572-9710en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42405
dc.description.abstractWe compare species richness of birds, fruit-feeding butterflies and ground-foraging ants along a coffee intensification gradient represented by a reduction in the number of species of shade trees and percentage of shade cover in coffee plantations. We sampled the three taxa in the same plots within the same period of time. Two sites were selected in the Soconusco region of the state of Chiapas, Mexico. Within each site four habitat types were selected and within each habitat type four points were randomly selected. The habitat types were forest, rustic coffee, diverse shade coffee, and intensive coffee (low density of shade). We found different responses of the three taxa along the intensification gradient. While ants and butterflies generally decrease in species richness with the decrease of shade cover, birds declined in one site but increased in the other. Ant species richness appears to be more resistant to habitat modification, while butterfly species richness appears to be more sensitive. Bird species richness was correlated with distance from forest fragments but not with habitat type, suggesting that scale and landscape structure may be important for more mobile taxa. For each of these taxa, the rustic plantation was the one that maintained species richness most similar to the forest. We found no correlation between the three taxa, suggesting that none of these taxa are good candidates as surrogates for each other. We discuss the implications of these results for the conservation of biodiversity in coffee plantations, in particular, the importance of distinguishing between different levels of shade, and the possibility that different taxa might be responding to habitat changes at different spatial scales.en_US
dc.format.extent416096 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; Kluwer Academic Publishers ; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherLife Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherEvolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.otherTree Biologyen_US
dc.subject.otherPlant Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherAntsen_US
dc.subject.otherBiodiversityen_US
dc.subject.otherBirdsen_US
dc.subject.otherButterfliesen_US
dc.subject.otherCoffeeen_US
dc.subject.otherIndicator Taxaen_US
dc.subject.otherMexicoen_US
dc.subject.otherSpecies Richnessen_US
dc.titleConservation of biodiversity in coffee agroecosystems: a tri-taxa comparison in southern Mexicoen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 48109-1115, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 48109-1115, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 48109-1115, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/42405/1/10531_2004_Article_5096977.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023039921916en_US
dc.identifier.sourceBiodiversity and Conservationen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.