Conservation of biodiversity in coffee agroecosystems: a tri-taxa comparison in southern Mexico
dc.contributor.author | Perfecto, Ivette | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mas, Alexandre | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Dietsch, Thomas | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Vandermeer, John H. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-09-08T20:18:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-09-08T20:18:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2003-06 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Perfecto, Ivette; Mas, Alexandre; Dietsch, Thomas; Vandermeer, John; (2003). "Conservation of biodiversity in coffee agroecosystems: a tri-taxa comparison in southern Mexico." Biodiversity and Conservation 12(6): 1239-1252. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42405> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0960-3115 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1572-9710 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42405 | |
dc.description.abstract | We compare species richness of birds, fruit-feeding butterflies and ground-foraging ants along a coffee intensification gradient represented by a reduction in the number of species of shade trees and percentage of shade cover in coffee plantations. We sampled the three taxa in the same plots within the same period of time. Two sites were selected in the Soconusco region of the state of Chiapas, Mexico. Within each site four habitat types were selected and within each habitat type four points were randomly selected. The habitat types were forest, rustic coffee, diverse shade coffee, and intensive coffee (low density of shade). We found different responses of the three taxa along the intensification gradient. While ants and butterflies generally decrease in species richness with the decrease of shade cover, birds declined in one site but increased in the other. Ant species richness appears to be more resistant to habitat modification, while butterfly species richness appears to be more sensitive. Bird species richness was correlated with distance from forest fragments but not with habitat type, suggesting that scale and landscape structure may be important for more mobile taxa. For each of these taxa, the rustic plantation was the one that maintained species richness most similar to the forest. We found no correlation between the three taxa, suggesting that none of these taxa are good candidates as surrogates for each other. We discuss the implications of these results for the conservation of biodiversity in coffee plantations, in particular, the importance of distinguishing between different levels of shade, and the possibility that different taxa might be responding to habitat changes at different spatial scales. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 416096 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3115 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; Kluwer Academic Publishers ; Springer Science+Business Media | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Life Sciences | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Evolutionary Biology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Tree Biology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Plant Sciences | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Ants | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Biodiversity | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Birds | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Butterflies | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Coffee | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Indicator Taxa | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Mexico | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Species Richness | en_US |
dc.title | Conservation of biodiversity in coffee agroecosystems: a tri-taxa comparison in southern Mexico | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Natural Resources and Environment | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Ecology and Evolutionary Biology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 48109-1115, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 48109-1115, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 48109-1115, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Department of Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 48109, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/42405/1/10531_2004_Article_5096977.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023039921916 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Biodiversity and Conservation | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.