Show simple item record

Outcomes after Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Those ≥80 Years of Age: Recent Veterans Affairs Experience

dc.contributor.authorPerkins, Anthony J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKazmers, Andrisen_US
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, Lloyd A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T20:19:57Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T20:19:57Z
dc.date.issued1998-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationKazmers, Andris; Perkins, Anthony J.; Jacobs, Lloyd A.; (1998). "Outcomes after Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Those ≥80 Years of Age: Recent Veterans Affairs Experience." Annals of Vascular Surgery 12(2): 106-112. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42431>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0890-5096en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42431
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=9514226&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstract= 231) of the patients. A total of 5833 patients underwent repair of nonruptured AAA: mortality was 4.1% (228/5627) in those <80 and 8.25% (17/206) in those ≥80 years old ( p < 0.009). Logistic regression analysis indicated age ≥80 was independently associated with higher mortality (odds ratio 1.834:1, 95% bounds 1.117-3.012). Octogenarian status (defined as ≥80 years of age), however, had a less important association with in-hospital death than did surgical complications of the heart or genitourinary tract, postoperative hemorrhage, septicemia, respiratory insufficiency, myocardial infarction (MI), acute renal failure, surgical complications of the central nervous system (CNS), aneurysm rupture, postoperative shock, or disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), in ascending order of importance. Only 5.9% ( n = 25) of the 427 patients undergoing repair of ruptured AAA were ≥80 years old. In those ≥80 undergoing repair of ruptured aneurysms, mortality was 48% which did not differ from the 45% mortality in those <80 (NS). The likelihood that one would be operated for rupture was statistically greater (1.66:1) for those ≥80 years ( p < 0.025). Length of stay (LOS) for those ≥80 undergoing AAA repair was longer being 22.3 ± 14.8 days versus 18.3 ± 13.2 days for younger patients ( p < 0.001). Mortality and LOS after AAA repair were statistically greater for those ≥80 years of age. Severity of illness, however, was also greater for octogenarians. Patient Management Category (PMC) software defined illness severity was 4.06 ± 1.22 in octogenarians versus 3.84 ± 1.13 for those younger ( p < 0.005). Though age ≥80 was independently associated with increased mortality, selected elderly patients could benefit from AAA repair.en_US
dc.format.extent388583 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlag; by Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherLegacyen_US
dc.titleOutcomes after Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Those ≥80 Years of Age: Recent Veterans Affairs Experienceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSurgery and Anesthesiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelRadiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherAnn Arbor Health Services Research & Development, Department of Veterans Affairs, Detroit, MI, USen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Vascular Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid9514226en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/42431/1/10016-12-2-106_12n2p106.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s100169900125en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAnnals of Vascular Surgeryen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.