Show simple item record

Comparison of thallium-201 SPECT redistribution patterns and rubidium-82 PET rest-stress myocardial blood flow imaging

dc.contributor.authorStewart, Richard E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPopma, Jeffrey J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGacioch, Gerald M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKalus, Mortonen_US
dc.contributor.authorSquicciarini, Sheilaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAl-Aouar, Ziaden_US
dc.contributor.authorSchork, M. Anthonyen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchwaiger, Markusen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T20:26:52Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T20:26:52Z
dc.date.issued1994-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationStewart, Richard E.; Popma, Jeffrey; Gacioch, Gerald M.; Kalus, Morton; Squicciarini, Sheila; Al-Aouar, Ziad; Schork, M. Anthony; Schwaiger, Markus; (1994). "Comparison of thallium-201 SPECT redistribution patterns and rubidium-82 PET rest-stress myocardial blood flow imaging." The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging 10(1): 15-23. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42537>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0167-9899en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-0743en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42537
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=8021527&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractTo compare regional thallium-201 SPECT redistribution patterns with rubidium-82 PET, we studied 81 patients with both imaging modalities. Sixty patients had significant coronary artery disease. All patients underwent PET imaging after dipyridamole infusion, while SPECT imaging was performed after exercise stress (38 patients) and dipyridamole (43 patients). Sixty-eight percent of patients with prior infarct had fixed defects on SPECT, compared to 39% with PET. Sixty-one percent of patients with prior infarct had PET perfusion defects which exhibited ‘reflow’ or normal rubidium-82 tracer uptake (p < 0.05 vs. SPECT). Similar results were seen in patients without prior infarct (26% fixed defects on SPECT vs. 12% for PET, p < 0.05). Regional analysis showed that 57% of fixed SPECT defects corresponded to PET defects with reflow or normal rubidium-82 uptake, while 78% of ‘fixed’ PET defects corresponded to fixed SPECT defects. PET reflow and normal rubidium-82 uptake in sites of fixed thallium-201 SPECT perfusion defects suggest that imaging modalities employing separate tracer injections at rest and after stress, such as rubidium-82 PET, may be more specific in the assessment of myocardial viability, especially in patients with prior myocardial infarction.en_US
dc.format.extent1024698 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherMedicine & Public Healthen_US
dc.subject.otherCardiologyen_US
dc.subject.otherThallium SPECTen_US
dc.subject.otherRubidium PETen_US
dc.subject.otherMyocardial Perfusionen_US
dc.titleComparison of thallium-201 SPECT redistribution patterns and rubidium-82 PET rest-stress myocardial blood flow imagingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, 48109-0028, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, 48109-0028, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Cardiology, 48109-0028, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, 48109-0028, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Cardiology, 48109-0028, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, 48109-0028, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, 48109-0028, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, 48109-0028, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, 48109-0028, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, 48109-0028, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Cardiology, 48109-0028, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid8021527en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/42537/1/10554_2005_Article_BF01151577.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01151577en_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe International Journal of Cardiac Imagingen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.