Show simple item record

Quantitative Doppler tissue imaging as a correlate of left ventricular contractility

dc.contributor.authorBach, David S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T20:27:00Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T20:27:00Z
dc.date.issued1996-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationBach, David S.; (1996). "Quantitative Doppler tissue imaging as a correlate of left ventricular contractility." The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging 12(3): 191-195. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42539>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0167-9899en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-0743en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42539
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=8915720&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractDoppler tissue imaging is a new noninvasive imaging modality that allows quantitation of the low intensity, high amplitude Doppler shifts in the range of myocardial tissue motion. This study was performed to test the hypothesis that Doppler tissue imaging may provide unique information reflecting left ventricular systolic function, and to test the relationship between myocardial tissue velocity and noninvasive measures of ventricular contractility. Nine patients with mild or moderate mitral insufficiency and no regional wall motion abnormality were studied during dobutamine stress echocardiography. Left ventricular ejection fraction and peak systolic velocity of the sub- endocardial left ventricular posterior wall were quantified at baseline and at peak stress and compared with estimated peak dP/dt. During dobutamine infusion, ejection fraction increased from 41.7±22.2 (range 14 to 70) % to 56.6±27.9 (range 17 to 84) % (p=0.001), peak systolic velocity increased from 22.7±4.2 (range 18 to 28) mm/sec to 35.3±10.1 (range 20 to 47) mm/sec (p=0.004), and dP/dt increased from 1050±322 (range 613 to 1574) mm Hg/sec to 1766±768 (range 936 to 3000) mm Hg/sec (p=0.01). Although there were good correlations between left ventricular dP/dt and both ejection fraction (R=0.75) and peak systolic velocity (R=0.81), the correlation between change in dP/dt and change in myocardial velocity (R=0.75) was better than that between change in dP/dt and change in ejection fraction (R=0.36). These data support the hypothesis that myocardial velocity determined with Doppler tissue imaging reflects myocardial contractility, and that catecholamine- induced alteration in contractility is better reflected by changes in myocardial velocity than by changes in ejection fraction.en_US
dc.format.extent540806 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherMedicine & Public Healthen_US
dc.subject.otherCardiologyen_US
dc.subject.otherEchocardiography/Doppleren_US
dc.subject.otherLeft Ventricular Functionen_US
dc.subject.otherMyocardial Contractilityen_US
dc.titleQuantitative Doppler tissue imaging as a correlate of left ventricular contractilityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology University of Michigan, 48109, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid8915720en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/42539/1/10554_2005_Article_BF01806222.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01806222en_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe International Journal of Cardiac Imagingen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.