Show simple item record

Groupware Environments as Action Constitutive Resources: A Social Action Framework for Analyzing Groupware Technologies

dc.contributor.authorNgwenyama, Ojelanki K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLyytinen, Kalle J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T20:31:40Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T20:31:40Z
dc.date.issued1997-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationNgwenyama, Ojelanki K.; Lyytinen, Kalle J.; (1997). "Groupware Environments as Action Constitutive Resources: A Social Action Framework for Analyzing Groupware Technologies." Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 6(1): 71-93. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42610>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0925-9724en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-7551en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42610
dc.description.abstractComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) is a relatively new and dynamic field dealing with the development and use of groupware technologies in organizations. Several frameworks and models have been proposed for studying CSCW, each conveying a different perspective and theoretical basis. Although these frameworks have contributed much to our understanding of the field, they can be criticized for a lack of holistic understanding of the complex social activity that is constitutive of groupwork. This often leads to the failure of otherwise well designed CSCW applications. In this paper we take up this challenge and propose a social action framework for analyzing groupware technologies. The framework is based on Habermas's theory of social action and four action categories, and the idea that groupware applications serve as sets of rules and resources which mediate group interactions. We demonstrate the value of the framework by analyzing a wide range of existing groupware technologies for their appropriateness to specific groupwork situations in terms of their espoused or implicit assumptions of groupwork, and the action constitutive resources they provide. Our analysis points out that a host of current groupware applications can be fairly easily classified and examined by the way they are configured to support different types of social action. It also suggests that, when implementing groupware applications, developers should critically evaluate: (a) the need for supporting a rich variety of action types, (b) the possible role of computer support in the specific groupwork situations, and (c) the underlying assumptions of groupwork embedded in the groupware platform. Finally, we will discuss how the framework can inform future research and development in the field.en_US
dc.format.extent129140 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherHumanities / Arts / Designen_US
dc.subject.otherComputer Science, Generalen_US
dc.subject.otherInterdisciplinary Studiesen_US
dc.subject.otherSocial Sciences, Generalen_US
dc.subject.otherCommunicationen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychology, Generalen_US
dc.subject.otherComputer Supported Cooperative Worken_US
dc.subject.otherGroupwareen_US
dc.subject.otherGroup Support Systemsen_US
dc.subject.otherDecision Support Systemsen_US
dc.subject.otherCommunication Systemsen_US
dc.subject.otherCollaboration Technologyen_US
dc.subject.otherCoordination Systemsen_US
dc.subject.otherSocial Action Theoryen_US
dc.titleGroupware Environments as Action Constitutive Resources: A Social Action Framework for Analyzing Groupware Technologiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Business School, Ann Arbor, MI, U.S.Aen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherComputer Science and Information Systems, University of Jyväskylä, SF-40 100, Finlanden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/42610/1/10606_2004_Article_124285.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008600220584en_US
dc.identifier.sourceComputer Supported Cooperative Worken_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.