Show simple item record

Do body and fin form affect the abilities of fish to stabilize swimming during maneuvers through vertical and horizontal tubes?

dc.contributor.authorSchrank, Amy J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWebb, Paul W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T20:33:42Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T20:33:42Z
dc.date.issued1998-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationSchrank, Amy J.; Webb, Paul W.; (1998). "Do body and fin form affect the abilities of fish to stabilize swimming during maneuvers through vertical and horizontal tubes?." Environmental Biology of Fishes 53(4): 365-371. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42641>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0378-1909en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-5133en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42641
dc.description.abstractGoldfish, Carassius auratus, silver dollar, Metynnis hypsauchen, and angelfish, Pterophyllum scalare were induced to swim through narrow vertical and horizontal tubes ranging in length from 0 to 20 cm (approximately 0 to 3 times total fish length, FL). The ability to stabilize the body while negotiating these confined spaces was quantified as (1) the minimum width of vertical (w v ) and horizontal (w h ) tubes traversed, where width is the smaller cross-sectional dimension of the tube, (2) the ratio w v /w h , and (3) transit speed through the tubes. Tube width was expressed as relative width, obtained by dividing tube width by fish length. Minimum relative widths traversed increased from 0.15 to 0.19 in the order silver dollar > angelfish > goldfish for vertical tubes and from 0.17 to 0.18 in the order goldfish=silver dollar > angelfish for horizontal tubes. w v /w h increased from 0.91 to 1.10 in the order silver dollar=angelfish > goldfish. Minimum tube widths generally increased with tube length for vertical tubes. Although significant differences in relative minimum widths among species were found, these were small. In contrast, for horizontal tubes, there was no significant effect of tube length on minimum tube width for any species. Large differences were found in transit speed. Transit speed generally decreased as the tube length increased. The slope of the relationship between transit speed and tube length varied among species generally increasing from − 0.41 to − 1.16 for horizontal tubes in the order goldfish > silver dollar > angelfish and from − 0.42 to − 1.07 in the order silver dollar > goldfish > angelfish for vertical tubes. As a result, goldfish usually took longest to traverse tubes of zero length but the shortest time to traverse the longest tubes. In contrast, angelfish traversed short tubes in the least time and long tubes in the greatest time. Deeper bodied angelfish swam slowly and traversed tubes with difficulty because they required experience during each trial to replace median and paired fin with body and caudal fin swimming. According to our data, goldfish were best able to swim in confined spaces.en_US
dc.format.extent380060 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherEnvironmenten_US
dc.subject.otherHydrobiologyen_US
dc.subject.otherZoologyen_US
dc.subject.otherAnimal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeographyen_US
dc.subject.otherEnvironment, Generalen_US
dc.subject.otherNature Conservationen_US
dc.subject.otherCarassius Auratusen_US
dc.subject.otherMetynnis Hypsauchenen_US
dc.subject.otherPterophyllum Scalareen_US
dc.subject.otherGoldfishen_US
dc.subject.otherAngelfishen_US
dc.subject.otherSilver Dollaren_US
dc.subject.otherSwimmingen_US
dc.subject.otherStabilityen_US
dc.titleDo body and fin form affect the abilities of fish to stabilize swimming during maneuvers through vertical and horizontal tubes?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-1115, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-1115, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/42641/1/10641_2004_Article_180525.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007414911734en_US
dc.identifier.sourceEnvironmental Biology of Fishesen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.