Show simple item record

Investigating the community consequences of competition among clonal plants

dc.contributor.authorGough, Lauraen_US
dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, Deborah E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHershock, Chaden_US
dc.contributor.authorPauliukonis, Nijoleen_US
dc.contributor.authorPetru, Martinaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T20:40:13Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T20:40:13Z
dc.date.issued2001-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationGough, Laura; Goldberg, Deborah E.; Hershock, Chad; Pauliukonis, Nijole; Petru, Martina; (2001). "Investigating the community consequences of competition among clonal plants." Evolutionary Ecology 15 (4-6): 547-563. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42740>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0269-7653en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-8477en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42740
dc.description.abstractAlthough clonal plants comprise most of the biomass of several widespread ecosystems, including many grasslands, wetlands, and tundra, our understanding of the effects of clonal attributes on community patterns and processes is weak. Here we present the conceptual basis for experiments focused on manipulating clonal attributes in a community context to determine how clonal characteristics affect interactions among plants at both the individual and community levels. All treatments are replicated at low and high density in a community density series to compare plant responses in environments of different competitive intensity. We examine clonal integration, the sharing of resources among ramets, by severing ramets from one another and comparing their response to ramets with intact connections. Ramet aggregation, the spacing of ramets relative to each other, is investigated by comparing species that differ in their natural aggregation (either clumped growth forms, with ramets tightly packed together, or runner growth forms, with ramets loosely spread) and by planting individual ramets of all species evenly spaced throughout a mesocosm. We illustrate how to test predictions to examine the influence of these two clonal traits on competitive interactions at the individual and community levels. To evaluate the effect of clonal integration on competition, we test two predictions: at the individual level, species with greater clonal integration will be better individual-level competitors, and at the community level, competition will cause a greater change in community composition when ramets are integrated (connected) than when they are not. For aggregation we test at the individual level: clumped growth forms are better competitors than runner growth forms because of their ability to resist invasion, and at the community level: competition will have a greater effect on community structure when ramets are evenly planted. An additional prediction connects the individual- and community-level effects of competition: resistance ability better predicts the effects of competition on relative abundance in a community than does invasion ability. We discuss additional experimental design considerations as revealed by our ongoing studies. Examining how clonal attributes affect both the individual- and community-level effects of competition requires new methods and metrics such as those presented here, and is vital to understanding the role of clonality in community structure of many ecosystems.en_US
dc.format.extent279849 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherLife Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherHuman Geneticsen_US
dc.subject.otherEvolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.otherPlant Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherClonal Integrationen_US
dc.subject.otherCommunityen_US
dc.subject.otherCompetitionen_US
dc.subject.otherRamet Aggregationen_US
dc.titleInvestigating the community consequences of competition among clonal plantsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487-0206, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487-0206, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of South Bohemia, Branisovksa 31, CZ-370 05, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republicen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/42740/1/10682_2004_Article_402554.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1016061604630en_US
dc.identifier.sourceEvolutionary Ecologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.