Show simple item record

Response of bacteria and phytoplankton to contaminated sediments from Trenton Channel, Detroit River

dc.contributor.authorMoll, Russell A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMansfield, Pamela J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T20:49:40Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T20:49:40Z
dc.date.issued1991-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationMoll, Russell A.; Mansfield, Pamela J.; (1991). "Response of bacteria and phytoplankton to contaminated sediments from Trenton Channel, Detroit River." Hydrobiologia 219(1): 281-299. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42882>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0018-8158en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-5117en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42882
dc.description.abstractSeveral types of bioassays were used in 1986 and 1987 to investigate the effect of contaminated sediments on natural populations of bacteria and phytoplankton from the Trenton Channel, Detroit River. The approach included the measurement of uptake of 3 H-glucose or 3 H-adenine by bacteria and 14 C-bicarbonate by phytoplankton in the presence of different amounts of Trenton Channel and Lake Michigan (control) sediments. Trenton Channel sediments are contaminated by high levels of toxic organic compounds and metals, especially zinc, lead, and copper. Because levels of biomass of bacteria and phytoplankton varied widely among the different bioassays, it was necessary to adjust uptake rates for biomass. Biomass adjustments were made using acridine orange counts for bacteria and chlorophyll measurements for phytoplankton. The results show a statistically significant suppression of uptake of substrates for both bacteria and phytoplankton with increasing amounts of sediment. Uptake was suppressed as much as 90 percent for bacteria and 93 percent for phytoplankton at 1200 mg l -1 of Trenton Channel sediments compared to bioassays without sediment. Uncontaminated Lake Michigan sediment suppressed uptake much less than Detroit River sediment; the difference in suppression of uptake between the two types of sediment was statistically significant for both bacteria and phytoplankton.en_US
dc.format.extent1506195 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherLife Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherEcologyen_US
dc.subject.otherHydrobiologyen_US
dc.subject.otherContaminated Sediment Bioassayen_US
dc.subject.otherPhytoplanktonen_US
dc.subject.otherBacteriaen_US
dc.subject.otherPrimary Productivityen_US
dc.subject.otherHeterotrophic Activityen_US
dc.subject.otherDetroit Riveren_US
dc.titleResponse of bacteria and phytoplankton to contaminated sediments from Trenton Channel, Detroit Riveren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for Great Lakes and Aquatic Sciences, The University of Michigan, 2200 Bonisteel Blvd., 48109-2099, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for Great Lakes and Aquatic Sciences, The University of Michigan, 2200 Bonisteel Blvd., 48109-2099, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/42882/1/10750_2004_Article_BF00024761.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00024761en_US
dc.identifier.sourceHydrobiologiaen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.