Show simple item record

Assessing alternative futures for agriculture in Iowa, U.S.A.

dc.contributor.authorSantelmann, M. V.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWhite, David S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFreemark, K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNassauer, Joan Iversonen_US
dc.contributor.authorEilers, J. M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVache, K. B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDanielson, B. J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCorry, Robert C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorClark, M. E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPolasky, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCruse, Richard M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSifneos, J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRustigian, H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCoiner, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWu, J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDebinski, D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T21:07:56Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T21:07:56Z
dc.date.issued2004-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationSantelmann, M.V.; White, D.; Freemark, K.; Nassauer, J.I.; Eilers, J.M.; Vaché, K.B.; Danielson, B.J.; Corry, R.C.; Clark, M.E.; Polasky, S.; Cruse, R.M.; Sifneos, J.; Rustigian, H.; Coiner, C.; Wu, J.; Debinski, D.; (2004). "Assessing alternative futures for agriculture in Iowa, U.S.A.." Landscape Ecology 19(4): 357-374. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43158>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0921-2973en_US
dc.identifier.issn1572-9761en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43158
dc.description.abstractThe contributions of current agricultural practices to environmental degradation and the social problems facing agricultural regions are well known. However, landscape-scale alternatives to current trends have not been fully explored nor their potential impacts quantified. To address this research need, our interdisciplinary team designed three alternative future scenarios for two watersheds in Iowa, USA, and used spatially-explicit models to evaluate the potential consequences of changes in farmland management. This paper summarizes and integrates the results of this interdisciplinary research project into an assessment of the designed alternatives intended to improve our understanding of landscape ecology in agricultural ecosystems and to inform agricultural policy. Scenario futures were digitized into a Geographic Information System (GIS), visualized with maps and simulated images, and evaluated for multiple endpoints to assess impacts of land use change on water quality, social and economic goals, and native flora and fauna. The Biodiversity scenario, targeting restoration of indigenous biodiversity, ranked higher than the current landscape for all endpoints (biodiversity, water quality, farmer preference, and profitability). The Biodiversity scenario ranked higher than the Production scenario (which focused on profitable agricultural production) in all endpoints but profitability, for which the two scenarios scored similarly, and also ranked higher than the Water Quality scenario in all endpoints except water quality. The Water Quality scenario, which targeted improvement in water quality, ranked highest of all landscapes in potential water quality and higher than the current landscape and the Production scenario in all but profitability. Our results indicate that innovative agricultural practices targeting environmental improvements may be acceptable to farmers and could substantially reduce the environmental impacts of agriculture in this region.en_US
dc.format.extent540423 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherLife Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherEcologyen_US
dc.subject.otherLandscape Ecologyen_US
dc.subject.otherPlant Ecologyen_US
dc.subject.otherForestryen_US
dc.subject.otherForestry Managementen_US
dc.subject.otherPlant Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherAgricultureen_US
dc.subject.otherBiodiversityen_US
dc.subject.otherSocio-economicsen_US
dc.subject.otherScenariosen_US
dc.subject.otherWater Qualityen_US
dc.titleAssessing alternative futures for agriculture in Iowa, U.S.A.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109; Department of Environmental Design & Rural Development, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Geosciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Geosciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR, 97333, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNational Wildlife Research Centre, Canadian Wildlife Service, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0H3, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherE&S Environmental Chemistry, Corvallis, OR; MaxDepth Aquatics, Inc., Bend, OR, 97701, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Bioresource Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011; Department of Biological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58105, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartments of Applied Economics and Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul-Minneapolis, MN, 55108, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Geosciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Geosciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43158/1/10980_2004_Article_5253979.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:LAND.0000030459.43445.19en_US
dc.identifier.sourceLandscape Ecologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.