Show simple item record

Methodological problems and policy implications in sexual harassment research

dc.contributor.authorGruber, James E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T21:32:06Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T21:32:06Z
dc.date.issued1990-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationGruber, James E.; (1990). "Methodological problems and policy implications in sexual harassment research." Population Research and Policy Review 9(3): 235-254. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43525>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0167-5923en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-7829en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43525
dc.description.abstractThis paper argues that the ability of social research to influence legal arguments and policy decisions on sexual harassment in the workplace has been stymied by several methodological problems which are shared by most major studies on the topic. Determination of the incidence of harassment and its major sub-types is difficult because of problems with sampling (e.g., response rate, sample size) and instrument construction (e.g., number or variety of harassment categories). Additionally, severity of harassment is rarely treated as a variable.en_US
dc.format.extent1217618 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherEconomics / Management Scienceen_US
dc.subject.otherEconomic Policyen_US
dc.subject.otherPopulation Economicsen_US
dc.titleMethodological problems and policy implications in sexual harassment researchen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Sociology, University of Michigan, 48128-1491, Dearborn, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusDearbornen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43525/1/11113_2004_Article_BF00162837.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00162837en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePopulation Research and Policy Reviewen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.