Show simple item record

On evaluating the equivalency of alternative MDS representations

dc.contributor.authorLingoes, James C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBorg, Ingweren_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T21:34:09Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T21:34:09Z
dc.date.issued1986-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationLingoes, James C.; Borg, Ingwer; (1986). "On evaluating the equivalency of alternative MDS representations." Quality and Quantity 20 (2-3): 249-256. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43557>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-7845en_US
dc.identifier.issn0033-5177en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43557
dc.description.abstractA typical question in MDS is whether two alternative configurations that are both acceptable in terms of data fit may be considered “practically the same”. To answer such questions on the equivalency of MDS solutions. Lingoes & Borg (1983) have recently proposed a quasistatistical decision strategy that allows one to take various features of the situation into account. This paper adds another important piece of information to this approach: for the Lingoes-Borg decision criterion R , we compute what proportion of R -values is greater/less than the observed coefficient if one were to consider all possible alternative distance sets within certain bounds defined by the observed fit coefficients for two alternative MDS solutions, what are the limits of acceptability for such fit coefficients, and how are the observed MDS configurations interrelated.en_US
dc.format.extent420221 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Martinus Nijhoff Publishers ; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherDecision and Approximation Theoryen_US
dc.subject.otherSocial Sciences, Generalen_US
dc.subject.otherMethodology of the Social Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherMDS Configuration Similarityen_US
dc.subject.otherMonotone Transformationsen_US
dc.subject.otherConfirmatory Scalingen_US
dc.titleOn evaluating the equivalency of alternative MDS representationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Sciences (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelStatistics and Numeric Dataen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhilosophyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanitiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumThe University of Michigan, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherJustus Liebig Universität, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43557/1/11135_2004_Article_BF00227428.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00227428en_US
dc.identifier.sourceQuality and Quantityen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.