Show simple item record

Social environmental impacts on survey cooperation

dc.contributor.authorCouper, Mick P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGroves, Robert M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T21:34:17Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T21:34:17Z
dc.date.issued1996-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationCouper, Mick P.; Groves, Robert M.; (1996). "Social environmental impacts on survey cooperation." Quality and Quantity 30(2): 173-188. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43559>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0033-5177en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-7845en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43559
dc.description.abstractSocial environmental influences on survey cooperation are explored using data from six national household surveys in the United States matched to 1990 decennial census data. Consistent with the past literature on prosocial behavior, cooperation rates in these six surveys are found to be lower in urban, densely populated, high crime rate areas. Measures of social cohesion show no evidence of influencing cooperation. The influence of the environmental variables is then observed after introducing statistical controls for household structure, race, age of household members, presence of children, and socioeconomic attributes of households. Over half of the measured influence of the environmental variables is explained by these household-level attributes. These findings have practical import for survey administrators and are informative for the construction of a theory of survey participation.en_US
dc.format.extent1165378 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherSocial Sciences, Generalen_US
dc.subject.otherMethodology of the Social Sciencesen_US
dc.titleSocial environmental impacts on survey cooperationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Sciences (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhilosophyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelStatistics and Numeric Dataen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanitiesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSurvey Research Center, University of Michigan, 1218 Le Frak Hall, 20742, College Park, MD, U.S.A.; Joint Program in Survey Methodology, 1218 Le Frak Hall, 20742, College Park, MD, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSurvey Research Center, University of Michigan, 1218 Le Frak Hall, 20742, College Park, MD, U.S.A.; Joint Program in Survey Methodology, 1218 Le Frak Hall, 20742, College Park, MD, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43559/1/11135_2004_Article_BF00153986.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00153986en_US
dc.identifier.sourceQuality and Quantityen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.