Show simple item record

High-dimensional maximum marginal likelihood item factor analysis by adaptive quadrature

dc.contributor.authorSchilling, Stephenen_US
dc.contributor.authorBock, R. Darrellen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T21:36:37Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T21:36:37Z
dc.date.issued2005-10-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationSchilling, Stephen; Bock, R. Darrell.; (2005). "High-dimensional maximum marginal likelihood item factor analysis by adaptive quadrature." Psychometrika (): -. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43596>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0033-3123en_US
dc.identifier.issn1860-0980en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43596
dc.description.abstractAlthough the Bock–Aitkin likelihood-based estimation method for factor analysis of dichotomous item response data has important advantages over classical analysis of item tetrachoric correlations, a serious limitation of the method is its reliance on fixed-point Gauss-Hermite (G-H) quadrature in the solution of the likelihood equations and likelihood-ratio tests. When the number of latent dimensions is large, computational considerations require that the number of quadrature points per dimension be few. But with large numbers of items, the dispersion of the likelihood, given the response pattern, becomes so small that the likelihood cannot be accurately evaluated with the sparse fixed points in the latent space. In this paper, we demonstrate that substantial improvement in accuracy can be obtained by adapting the quadrature points to the location and dispersion of the likelihood surfaces corresponding to each distinct pattern in the data. In particular, we show that adaptive G-H quadrature, combined with mean and covariance adjustments at each iteration of an EM algorithm, produces an accurate fast-converging solution with as few as two points per dimension. Evaluations of this method with simulated data are shown to yield accurate recovery of the generating factor loadings for models of upto eight dimensions. Unlike an earlier application of adaptive Gibbs sampling to this problem by Meng and Schilling, the simulations also confirm the validity of the present method in calculating likelihood-ratio chi-square statistics for determining the number of factors required in the model. Finally, we apply the method to a sample of real data from a test of teacher qualifications.en_US
dc.format.extent277123 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlag; The Psychometric Societyen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherStatistical Theory and Methodsen_US
dc.subject.otherAssessment, Testing and Evaluationen_US
dc.subject.otherStatistics for Social Science, Behavorial Science, Education, Public Policy, and Lawen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychology, Generalen_US
dc.subject.otherFactor Analysisen_US
dc.subject.otherItem Response Theoryen_US
dc.subject.otherLatent Variablesen_US
dc.subject.otherEM Algorithmen_US
dc.subject.otherMarginal Likelihood Estimationen_US
dc.subject.otherGLS Estimationen_US
dc.subject.otherAdaptive Quadratureen_US
dc.subject.otherMonte Carlo Integrationen_US
dc.titleHigh-dimensional maximum marginal likelihood item factor analysis by adaptive quadratureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCenter for Health Statistics, University of Illinois at Chicago, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43596/1/11336_2003_Article_1141.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11336-003-1141-xen_US
dc.identifier.sourcePsychometrikaen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.