Show simple item record

BOUNDARY PATROLS AND INTERGROUP ENCOUNTERS IN WILD CHIMPANZEES

dc.contributor.authorWatts, David P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMitani, John C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T21:37:43Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T21:37:43Z
dc.date.issued2001-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationWatts, David P.; Mitani, John C.; (2001). "BOUNDARY PATROLS AND INTERGROUP ENCOUNTERS IN WILD CHIMPANZEES." Behaviour 138(3): 299-327. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43613>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0005-7959en_US
dc.identifier.issn1568-539Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43613
dc.description.abstractChimpanzees are among the few mammals that engage in lethal coalitionary aggression between groups. Most attacks on neighbors occur when parties made up mostly of adult males patrol boundaries of their community's range. Patrols have time, energy, and opportunity costs, and entail some risks despite the tendency of males to attack only when they greatly outnumber their targets. These factors may lead to a collective action problem. Potential benefits include protection of community members, particularly infants; range expansion and increases in the amount and quality of food available; and incorporation of more females into the community. Males may not share these equally; for example, those able to obtain large shares of matings may stand to gain most by participating in patrols and to lose most by refraining. Despite the attention that boundary patrolling has attracted, few relevant quantitative data are available. Here, we present detailed data on boundary patrolling and intergroup aggression in a chimpanzee community at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda, that is unusually large and has more males than any other known community. Males there patrolled much more often, and patrol parties were much larger on average, than at two other sites for which comparative data exist. Our findings support the argument that male participation varies along with variation in potential gains, in willingness to take risks, and in skill at handling these risks. Both the overall frequency with which individual males patrolled and their willingness to join patrols as others set off on them were positively associated with variation in mating success, in participation in hunts of red colobus monkeys, and in hunting success. Males patrolled relatively often with others with whom they associated often in general, with whom they often groomed, and with whom they formed coalitions in withincommunity agonism. This indicates that they were most willing to take risks associated with patrolling when with others they trusted to take the same risks.en_US
dc.format.extent245086 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherBrill Academic Publishers; Koninklijke Brill, Leiden 2001 ; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherDevelopmental Biologyen_US
dc.subject.otherZoologyen_US
dc.subject.otherClinical Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherExperimental Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherCHIMPANZEESen_US
dc.subject.otherINTERGROUP AGGRESSIONen_US
dc.subject.otherBOUNDARY PATROLSen_US
dc.subject.otherCOOPERATIONen_US
dc.subject.otherCOLLECTIVE ACTIONen_US
dc.titleBOUNDARY PATROLS AND INTERGROUP ENCOUNTERS IN WILD CHIMPANZEESen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDept. Of Anthropology, The University of Michigan, 1020 LSA Bldg, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 48109en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDept. of Anthropology, Yale University, P.O. Box 208277, New Haven, CT, USA, 06520-8277en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43613/1/10520_2004_Article_brill_00057959_v138n3_s2.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685390152032488en_US
dc.identifier.sourceBehaviouren_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.