Show simple item record

Organizational Practices Enhancing the Influence of Student Assessment Information in Academic Decisions

dc.contributor.authorAugustine, Catherine H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPeterson, Marvin W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T21:38:17Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T21:38:17Z
dc.date.issued2000-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationPeterson, Marvin W.; Augustine, Catherine H.; (2000). "Organizational Practices Enhancing the Influence of Student Assessment Information in Academic Decisions." Research in Higher Education 41(1): 21-52. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43622>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0361-0365en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-188Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43622
dc.description.abstractStudent assessment should not be undertaken as an end in itself but as a means to educational and institutional improvement. The purpose of our study is to provide systematic empirical evidence of how postsecondary institutions support and promote the use of student assessment information in academic decision making. We use linear regression to determine which institutional variables are related to whether student assessment data is influential in academic decisions. Our conclusion is that student assessment data has only a marginal influence on academic decision making. Our data show there is slightly more influence on educationally related decisions than on faculty-related decisions, but in neither case is student assessment data very influential. Nonetheless, we did find several significant predictor variables in our model, including: the number of institutional studies relating students' performance to their interactions with the institution; conducting student assessment to improve internal institutional performance; involving student affairs personnel in student assessment; the extent of student assessment conducted; and the extent of professional development related to student assessment that is offered to faculty, staff, and administrators. These findings vary by institutional type.en_US
dc.format.extent84722 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; Human Sciences Press, Inc. ; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherEducationen_US
dc.subject.otherEducation (General)en_US
dc.subject.otherEducation Researchen_US
dc.subject.otherDevelopmental Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherPedagogic Psychologyen_US
dc.titleOrganizational Practices Enhancing the Influence of Student Assessment Information in Academic Decisionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, 2117E SEB, 610 E. University, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109–1259en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43622/1/11162_2004_Article_221314.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007038212131en_US
dc.identifier.sourceResearch in Higher Educationen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.