Show simple item record

Knowledge Integration in Science Teaching: Analysing Teachers' Knowledge Development

dc.contributor.authorDavis, Elizabeth A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T21:39:15Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T21:39:15Z
dc.date.issued2004-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationDavis, Elizabeth A.; (2004). "Knowledge Integration in Science Teaching: Analysing Teachers' Knowledge Development." Research in Science Education 34(1): 21-53. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43637>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0157-244Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-1898en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43637
dc.description.abstractThis paper tests the utility of a new sociocognitive frame for analysing the development of teachers' knowledge – the knowledge integration perspective (Linn, Eylon, & Davis, in press; Linn & Hsi, 2000). In doing so, the paper describes one prospective elementary teacher's developing knowledge and highlights its complexity. The prospective teacher demonstrates relatively well-integrated science subject matter knowledge, but she makes some problematic links to lessons and develops some instructional representations that show where she needs to distinguish between different scientific ideas. She also, however, links science concepts to appropriate real-world experiences, indicating that she has nascent useful pedagogical content knowledge. The paper discusses what teacher educators can learn about their learners from this analysis, argues for the utility of the knowledge integration perspective for conducting similar analyses, provides ideas to help science teacher educators apply the perspective easily as they teach their students, and points to areas ripe for future research.en_US
dc.format.extent216906 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherEducationen_US
dc.subject.otherEducation Researchen_US
dc.subject.otherScience Educationen_US
dc.subject.otherElementary Science Teachersen_US
dc.subject.otherInstructional Representationsen_US
dc.subject.otherKnowledge Integrationen_US
dc.subject.otherPedagogical Content Knowledgeen_US
dc.subject.otherProspective Teachersen_US
dc.subject.otherSubject Matter Knowledgeen_US
dc.subject.otherEducation (General)en_US
dc.titleKnowledge Integration in Science Teaching: Analysing Teachers' Knowledge Developmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelScience (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagementen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelWomen's and Gender Studiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanitiesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumThe University of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43637/1/11165_2004_Article_5257276.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000021034.01508.b8en_US
dc.identifier.sourceResearch in Science Educationen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.