Show simple item record

Culture and Personal Epistemology: U.S. and Middle Eastern Students’ beliefs about Scientific Knowledge and Knowing

dc.contributor.authorMoosa, Samiraen_US
dc.contributor.authorKarabenick, Stuart A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T13:52:30Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T13:52:30Z
dc.date.issued2005-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationKarabenick, Stuart A.; Moosa, Samira; (2005). "Culture and Personal Epistemology: U.S. and Middle Eastern Students’ beliefs about Scientific Knowledge and Knowing." Social Psychology of Education 8(4): 375-393. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43812>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1381-2890en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-1928en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43812
dc.description.abstractMiddle Eastern (Omani) and Western (U.S.) students’ beliefs about knowledge and knowing in the sciences were compared on four dimensions of personal epistemology proposed by Hofer and Pintrich ( Review of Educational Research (1997), 67 , 88–140). As predicted, given their experiences with comparatively traditional political and religious institutions, Omani more so than U.S. college students were more likely to accept scientific authorities as the basis of scientific truth. Furthermore, Omani men were more accepting of authorities than were Omani women, but there was no gender difference among U.S. students. Omani more than U.S. students also believed that knowledge in the sciences was simpler and more certain, which is consistent with comparisons between U.S. and Asian students (e.g., Qian & Pan, 2002, A comparision of epistemological beliefs and learning from science text between American and Chinese high school students. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistomology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 365–385), Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum). Students in the two countries did not differ, however, in whether their beliefs were based on personal opinions versus systematic evidence. Suggestions for further research included directly assessing experiences with, and attitudes toward, authorities in academic and other areas of students’ lives.en_US
dc.format.extent134052 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Springeren_US
dc.subject.otherEducationen_US
dc.subject.otherPersonality & Social Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherEducation (General)en_US
dc.subject.otherEducation & Societyen_US
dc.titleCulture and Personal Epistemology: U.S. and Middle Eastern Students’ beliefs about Scientific Knowledge and Knowingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSociologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCombined Program in Education and Psychology, 1400D School of Education Building, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCollege of Education, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Omanen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43812/1/11218_2005_Article_1826.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11218-005-1826-3en_US
dc.identifier.sourceSocial Psychology of Educationen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.