Show simple item record

McTaggart's paradox and Smith's tensed theory of time

dc.contributor.authorOaklander, L. Nathanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T13:52:56Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T13:52:56Z
dc.date.issued1996-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationOaklander, L. Nathan; (1996). "McTaggart's paradox and Smith's tensed theory of time." Synthese 107(2): 205-221. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43817>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0039-7857en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-0964en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43817
dc.description.abstractSince McTaggart first proposed his paradox asserting the unreality of time, numerous philosophers have attempted to defend the tensed theory of time against it. Certainly, one of the most highly developed and original is that put forth by Quentin Smith. Through discussing McTaggart's positive conception of time as well as his negative attack on its reality, I hope to clarify the dispute between those who believe in the existence of the transitory temporal properties of pastness, presentness and futurity , and those who deny their existence. We shall see that the debate centers around the ontological status of succession and the B-relations of earlier and later . I shall argue that Smith's tensed theory fails because he cannot account for the sense in which events have their tensed properties successively, and he cannot account for the direction of time.en_US
dc.format.extent1122763 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherPhilosophyen_US
dc.subject.otherPhilosophyen_US
dc.subject.otherEpistemologyen_US
dc.subject.otherLogicen_US
dc.subject.otherMetaphysicsen_US
dc.subject.otherPhilosophy of Languageen_US
dc.titleMcTaggart's paradox and Smith's tensed theory of timeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelScience (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Philosophy, University of Michigan-Flint, 48502-2186, Flint, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusFlinten_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43817/1/11229_2004_Article_BF00413606.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00413606en_US
dc.identifier.sourceSyntheseen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.