The utility of lockout valve reservoirs in preventing autoinflation in penile prostheses
dc.contributor.author | Miller, David C. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hollenbeck, Brent K. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ohl, Dana A. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-09-11T13:56:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-09-11T13:56:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2002-09 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Hollenbeck, Brent K.; Miller, David C.; Ohl, Dana A.; (2002). "The utility of lockout valve reservoirs in preventing autoinflation in penile prostheses." International Urology and Nephrology 34(3): 379-383. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43865> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0301-1623 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1573-2584 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43865 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=12899233&dopt=citation | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction : Autoinflation is a troublesomecomplication following penile prosthesisplacement that may be potentiated by prevesicalscarring following radical prostatectomy. Weevaluated the frequency of autoinflation andother complications following penile prosthesisplacement in radical prostatectomy patients andcontrols as a surrogate to establishing theutility of lockout reservoirs in preventingautoinflation. Methods : 139 prostheses (including 14with lockout reservoirs) were placed in 132 men(including 35 post-prostatectomy patients) overa 5 1 / 2 year period at our institution. Outcomesassessed include postoperative complicationsand the need for revision or replacement of theprosthesis. Multivariable regression analysiswas used to determine the association ofpatient, device-specific, and perioperativecharacteristics with these outcomes. Results : There was no difference in thepostoperative complication and re-operationrates between post-prostatectomy patients andcontrols (both p > 0.77). The incidence ofautoinflation in post-prostatectomy patientsand controls was 3% and 5%, respectively( p > 0.99). Patients with prior prostheseswere 3 times as likely to develop apostoperative complication or requireprosthesis revision ( p = 0.02). Conclusion : Penile prostheses are welltolerated in post-prostatectomy patients withcomparable outcomes to those men with organicerectile dysfunction. The frequency ofautoinflation does not appear to be increasedin post-prostatectomy patients. Initialresults with the lockout valve reservoir inpreventing autoinflation are encouraging thoughadditional study is warranted to justify theirroutine use. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 62745 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3115 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Kluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Media | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Medicine & Public Health | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Nephrology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Urology/Andrology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Penile Prosthesis | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Postoperative Complication | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Radical Prostatectomy | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Autoinflation | en_US |
dc.title | The utility of lockout valve reservoirs in preventing autoinflation in penile prostheses | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Internal Medicine and Specialties | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | The Department of Urology, the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | The Department of Urology, the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | The Department of Urology, the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 12899233 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43865/1/11255_2004_Article_5119589.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024439705539 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | International Urology and Nephrology | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.