Show simple item record

The utility of lockout valve reservoirs in preventing autoinflation in penile prostheses

dc.contributor.authorMiller, David C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHollenbeck, Brent K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOhl, Dana A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T13:56:50Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T13:56:50Z
dc.date.issued2002-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationHollenbeck, Brent K.; Miller, David C.; Ohl, Dana A.; (2002). "The utility of lockout valve reservoirs in preventing autoinflation in penile prostheses." International Urology and Nephrology 34(3): 379-383. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43865>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0301-1623en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-2584en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43865
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=12899233&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction : Autoinflation is a troublesomecomplication following penile prosthesisplacement that may be potentiated by prevesicalscarring following radical prostatectomy. Weevaluated the frequency of autoinflation andother complications following penile prosthesisplacement in radical prostatectomy patients andcontrols as a surrogate to establishing theutility of lockout reservoirs in preventingautoinflation. Methods : 139 prostheses (including 14with lockout reservoirs) were placed in 132 men(including 35 post-prostatectomy patients) overa 5 1 / 2 year period at our institution. Outcomesassessed include postoperative complicationsand the need for revision or replacement of theprosthesis. Multivariable regression analysiswas used to determine the association ofpatient, device-specific, and perioperativecharacteristics with these outcomes. Results : There was no difference in thepostoperative complication and re-operationrates between post-prostatectomy patients andcontrols (both p > 0.77). The incidence ofautoinflation in post-prostatectomy patientsand controls was 3% and 5%, respectively( p > 0.99). Patients with prior prostheseswere 3 times as likely to develop apostoperative complication or requireprosthesis revision ( p = 0.02). Conclusion : Penile prostheses are welltolerated in post-prostatectomy patients withcomparable outcomes to those men with organicerectile dysfunction. The frequency ofautoinflation does not appear to be increasedin post-prostatectomy patients. Initialresults with the lockout valve reservoir inpreventing autoinflation are encouraging thoughadditional study is warranted to justify theirroutine use.en_US
dc.format.extent62745 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherMedicine & Public Healthen_US
dc.subject.otherNephrologyen_US
dc.subject.otherUrology/Andrologyen_US
dc.subject.otherPenile Prosthesisen_US
dc.subject.otherPostoperative Complicationen_US
dc.subject.otherRadical Prostatectomyen_US
dc.subject.otherAutoinflationen_US
dc.titleThe utility of lockout valve reservoirs in preventing autoinflation in penile prosthesesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumThe Department of Urology, the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumThe Department of Urology, the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumThe Department of Urology, the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid12899233en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43865/1/11255_2004_Article_5119589.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024439705539en_US
dc.identifier.sourceInternational Urology and Nephrologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.