Show simple item record

Measuring the abruptness of patchy ecotones – A simulation-based comparison of landscape pattern statistics

dc.contributor.authorBowersox, Mark A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Daniel G.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T13:57:58Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T13:57:58Z
dc.date.issued2001-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationBowersox, Mark A.; Brown, Daniel G.; (2001). "Measuring the abruptness of patchy ecotones – A simulation-based comparison of landscape pattern statistics." Plant Ecology 156(1): 89-103. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43881>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1385-0237en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-5052en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43881
dc.description.abstractThe use of statistics of landscape pattern to infer ecological process at ecotones requires knowledge of the specific sensitivities of statistics to ecotone characteristics. In this study, sets of patch-based and boundary-based statistics were evaluated to assess their suitability as measures of abruptness on simulated ecotone landscapes. We generated 50 realizations each for 25 groups of ecotones that varied systematically in their degree of abruptness and patchiness. Factorial ANOVA was used to evaluate the sensitivity of statistics to the known differences among the simulated groups. Suitability of each index for measuring abruptness was evaluated using the ANOVA results. The statistics were then ranked in order of their suitability as abruptness statistics based on their sensitivity to abruptness, the consistency of the relationship, and their lack of sensitivity to patchiness. The two best statistics for quantifying abruptness were those we developed based on lattice delineation methods, and are called cumulative boundary elements and boundary element dispersion. The results of this research provide support for studies of ecotone process that rely on the interpretation of patch or boundary statistics.en_US
dc.format.extent260692 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherSpatial Analysisen_US
dc.subject.otherBoundariesen_US
dc.subject.otherLife Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherPlant Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherEcotonesen_US
dc.subject.otherLandscape Statisticsen_US
dc.subject.otherSimulationen_US
dc.titleMeasuring the abruptness of patchy ecotones – A simulation-based comparison of landscape pattern statisticsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-1115, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Geography, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48823-1115, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43881/1/11258_2004_Article_358202.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1011953007555en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePlant Ecologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.