Machine utilizations achieved using balanced FMS production ratios in a simulated setting
dc.contributor.author | Schriber, Thomas J. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Stecke, Kathryn E. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-09-11T14:20:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-09-11T14:20:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1988-12 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Schriber, Thomas J.; Stecke, Kathryn E.; (1988). "Machine utilizations achieved using balanced FMS production ratios in a simulated setting." Annals of Operations Research 15(1): 227-267. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44138> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0254-5330 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1572-9338 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44138 | |
dc.description.abstract | Stecke [21] has developed mathematical programming approaches for determining, from a set of part type requirements, the production ratios (part types to be produced next, and their proportions) which maximize overall machine utilizations by balancing machine workloads in a flexible manufacturing system (FMS). These mathematical programming (MP) approaches are aggregate in the sense that they do not take into account such things as contention for transportation resources, travel time for work-in-process, contention for machines, finite buffer space, and dispatching rules. In the current study, the sensitivity of machine utilizations to these aggregations is investigated through simulation modeling. For the situation examined, it is found that achieved machine utilizations are a strong function of some of the factors ignored in the MP methodology, ranging from 9.1% to 22.9% less than those theoretically attainable under the mathematical programming assumptions. The 9.1% degradation results from modeling with nonzero work-in-process travel times (i.e. 2 minutes per transfer) and using only central work-in-process buffers. Resource levels (e.g. the number of automated guided vehicles; the amount of work-in-process; the number of slack buffers) needed to limit the degradation to 9.1% correspond to FMS operating conditions which are feasible in practice. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 2776989 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3115 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Baltzer Science Publishers, Baarn/Kluwer Academic Publishers; J.C. Baltzer AG, Scientific Publishing Company ; Springer Science+Business Media | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Economics / Management Science | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Theory of Computation | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Combinatorics | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Operations Research/Decision Theory | en_US |
dc.subject.other | FMS | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Production Ratios | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Mathematical Programming | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Levels of Detail in Modeling | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Balanced Machine Workloads | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Machine Utilizations | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Dispatching Rules | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Simulation | en_US |
dc.title | Machine utilizations achieved using balanced FMS production ratios in a simulated setting | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Management | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Industrial and Operations Engineering | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Engineering | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Business | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Graduate School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan, 48109-1234, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Graduate School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan, 48109-1234, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44138/1/10479_2005_Article_BF02186798.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02186798 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Annals of Operations Research | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.