Show simple item record

Machine utilizations achieved using balanced FMS production ratios in a simulated setting

dc.contributor.authorSchriber, Thomas J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorStecke, Kathryn E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T14:20:32Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T14:20:32Z
dc.date.issued1988-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationSchriber, Thomas J.; Stecke, Kathryn E.; (1988). "Machine utilizations achieved using balanced FMS production ratios in a simulated setting." Annals of Operations Research 15(1): 227-267. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44138>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0254-5330en_US
dc.identifier.issn1572-9338en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44138
dc.description.abstractStecke [21] has developed mathematical programming approaches for determining, from a set of part type requirements, the production ratios (part types to be produced next, and their proportions) which maximize overall machine utilizations by balancing machine workloads in a flexible manufacturing system (FMS). These mathematical programming (MP) approaches are aggregate in the sense that they do not take into account such things as contention for transportation resources, travel time for work-in-process, contention for machines, finite buffer space, and dispatching rules. In the current study, the sensitivity of machine utilizations to these aggregations is investigated through simulation modeling. For the situation examined, it is found that achieved machine utilizations are a strong function of some of the factors ignored in the MP methodology, ranging from 9.1% to 22.9% less than those theoretically attainable under the mathematical programming assumptions. The 9.1% degradation results from modeling with nonzero work-in-process travel times (i.e. 2 minutes per transfer) and using only central work-in-process buffers. Resource levels (e.g. the number of automated guided vehicles; the amount of work-in-process; the number of slack buffers) needed to limit the degradation to 9.1% correspond to FMS operating conditions which are feasible in practice.en_US
dc.format.extent2776989 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherBaltzer Science Publishers, Baarn/Kluwer Academic Publishers; J.C. Baltzer AG, Scientific Publishing Company ; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherEconomics / Management Scienceen_US
dc.subject.otherTheory of Computationen_US
dc.subject.otherCombinatoricsen_US
dc.subject.otherOperations Research/Decision Theoryen_US
dc.subject.otherFMSen_US
dc.subject.otherProduction Ratiosen_US
dc.subject.otherMathematical Programmingen_US
dc.subject.otherLevels of Detail in Modelingen_US
dc.subject.otherBalanced Machine Workloadsen_US
dc.subject.otherMachine Utilizationsen_US
dc.subject.otherDispatching Rulesen_US
dc.subject.otherSimulationen_US
dc.titleMachine utilizations achieved using balanced FMS production ratios in a simulated settingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagementen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelIndustrial and Operations Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumGraduate School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan, 48109-1234, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumGraduate School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan, 48109-1234, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44138/1/10479_2005_Article_BF02186798.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02186798en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAnnals of Operations Researchen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.