Show simple item record

Proboscidean DNA from Museum and Fossil Specimens: An Assessment of Ancient DNA Extraction and Amplification Techniques

dc.contributor.authorYang, Hongen_US
dc.contributor.authorGolenberg, Edward M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorShoshani, Jeheskelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T14:22:36Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T14:22:36Z
dc.date.issued1997-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationYang, Hong; Golenberg, Edward M.; Shoshani, Jeheskel; (1997). "Proboscidean DNA from Museum and Fossil Specimens: An Assessment of Ancient DNA Extraction and Amplification Techniques." Biochemical Genetics 35 (5-6): 165-179. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44162>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0006-2928en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-4927en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44162
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=9332711&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractApplications of reliable DNA extraction and amplification techniques to postmortem samples are critical to ancient DNA research. Commonly used methods for isolating DNA from ancient material were tested and compared using both soft tissue and bones from fossil and contemporary museum proboscideans. DNAs isolated using three principal methods served as templates in subsequent PCR amplifications, and the PCR products were directly sequenced. Authentication of the ancient origin of obtained nucleotide sequences was established by demonstrating reproducibility under a blind testing system and by phylogenetic analysis. Our results indicate that ancient samples may respond differently to extraction buffers or purification procedures, and no single method was universally successful. A CTAB buffer method, modified from plant DNA extraction protocols, was found to have the highest success rate. Nested PCR was shown to be a reliable approach to amplify ancient DNA templates that failed in primary amplification.en_US
dc.format.extent1047963 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; Plenum Publishing Corporation ; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherCetyltrimethylammonium Bromide Extractionen_US
dc.subject.otherBiomedicineen_US
dc.subject.otherHuman Geneticsen_US
dc.subject.otherMedical Microbiologyen_US
dc.subject.otherBiochemistry, Generalen_US
dc.subject.otherZoologyen_US
dc.subject.otherAncient DNAen_US
dc.subject.otherNested Polymerase Chain Reactionen_US
dc.subject.otherProboscideansen_US
dc.titleProboscidean DNA from Museum and Fossil Specimens: An Assessment of Ancient DNA Extraction and Amplification Techniquesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMolecular, Cellular and Developmental Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, 48202; Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, 48202en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, 48202; Cranbrook Institute of Science, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, 48304en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid9332711en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44162/1/10528_2004_Article_413527.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021902125382en_US
dc.identifier.sourceBiochemical Geneticsen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.