Show simple item record

A Survey of Psychiatrists' Attitudes Toward Treatment Guidelines

dc.contributor.authorHealy, Daniel J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGoldman, Monaen_US
dc.contributor.authorFlorence, Timothyen_US
dc.contributor.authorMilner, Karen K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T14:36:50Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T14:36:50Z
dc.date.issued2004-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationHealy, Daniel J.; Goldman, Mona; Florence, Timothy; Milner, Karen K.; (2004). "A Survey of Psychiatrists' Attitudes Toward Treatment Guidelines." Community Mental Health Journal 40(2): 177-184. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44317>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-2789en_US
dc.identifier.issn0010-3853en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44317
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=15206641&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractWe developed a survey to look at psychiatrists' attitudes toward psychotropic prescribing guidelines, specifically the Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP) algorithms. The 22-page survey was distributed to 24 psychiatrists working in 4 CMHC's; 13 completed the survey. 90% agreed that guidelines should be general and flexible. The majority also agreed that guidelines should define how to measure response to a specific agent; fewer agreed guidelines should specify dosage, side effect management, or augmentation strategies. Psychiatrists were familiar with TMAP; none referred to it in their practice. In spite of this, psychiatrists' medication preferences were similar to those suggested by guidelines.en_US
dc.format.extent46685 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; Human Sciences Press, Inc. ; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherCommunity Mental Healthen_US
dc.subject.otherMacroeconomics/Monetary Economicsen_US
dc.subject.otherMedicine & Public Healthen_US
dc.subject.otherPublic Health/Gesundheitswesenen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychiatryen_US
dc.subject.otherHealth Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychotropic Medication Guidelinesen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychiatrists' Attitudesen_US
dc.titleA Survey of Psychiatrists' Attitudes Toward Treatment Guidelinesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Worken_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychiatryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Health System, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Health System, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Health System, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-0020en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid15206641en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44317/1/10597_2004_Article_484143.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:COMH.0000022736.61003.2een_US
dc.identifier.sourceCommunity Mental Health Journalen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.