Show simple item record

Review of Graph Comprehension Research: Implications for Instruction

dc.contributor.authorShah, Pritien_US
dc.contributor.authorHoeffner, Jamesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T14:49:04Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T14:49:04Z
dc.date.issued2002-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationShah, Priti; Hoeffner, James; (2002). "Review of Graph Comprehension Research: Implications for Instruction." Educational Psychology Review 14(1): 47-69. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44452>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-336Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1040-726Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44452
dc.description.abstractGraphs are commonly used in textbooks and educational software, and can help students understand science and social science data. However, students sometimes have difficulty comprehending information depicted in graphs. What makes a graph better or worse at communicating relevant quantitative information? How can students learn to interpret graphs more effectively? This article reviews the cognitive literature on how viewers comprehend graphs and the factors that influence viewers' interpretations. Three major factors are considered: the visual characteristics of a graph (e.g., format, animation, color, use of legend, size, etc.), a viewer's knowledge about graphs, and a viewer's knowledge and expectations about the content of the data in a graph. This article provides a set of guidelines for the presentation of graphs to students and considers the implications of graph comprehension research for the teaching of graphical literacy skills. Finally, this article discusses unresolved questions and directions for future research relevant to data presentation and the teaching of graphical literacy skills.en_US
dc.format.extent166915 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; Plenum Publishing Corporation ; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherPedagogic Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherGraph Comprehensionen_US
dc.subject.otherEducation (General)en_US
dc.subject.otherGraphical Literacyen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherClinical Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychological Methods/Evaluationen_US
dc.subject.otherGraphsen_US
dc.subject.otherGraphical Displaysen_US
dc.subject.otherScience Educationen_US
dc.titleReview of Graph Comprehension Research: Implications for Instructionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44452/1/10648_2004_Article_363437.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013180410169en_US
dc.identifier.sourceEducational Psychology Reviewen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.