Show simple item record

A comparative perspective on the evolution of tamarin and marmoset social systems

dc.contributor.authorGoldizen, Anne Wilsonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T14:58:24Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T14:58:24Z
dc.date.issued1990-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationGoldizen, Anne Wilson; (1990). "A comparative perspective on the evolution of tamarin and marmoset social systems." International Journal of Primatology 11(1): 63-83. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44556>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-8604en_US
dc.identifier.issn0164-0291en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44556
dc.description.abstractTamarins and marmosets (callitrichids) present an unusual opportunity for study of the determinants of primate social systems, because both the mating and infant care patterns of callitrichids are variable, even within individual populations. In this paper, I briefly describe three characteristics of callitrichid social systems that distinguish them from most other primates: extensive male parental care, helping by nonreproductive individuals, and variable mating patterns. I then discuss the evolution of these characteristics and of the frequent twinning exhibited by callitrichids. I suggest that an ancestor of modern callitrichids gave birth to a single offspring at a time, mated monogamously, and had significant paternal care. The idea that males of this ancestral form must have provided paternal care, even though only single infants were born, derives from a comparison of litter/mother weight ratios in modern primate species. Twinning perhaps then evolved because of a combination of dwarfing in the callitrichid lineage, leading to higher litter/mother weight ratios, and a high infant mortality rate, and because the extensive paternal care already present facilitated the raising of twins. I propose that the helping behavior of older offspring may have coevolved with twinning, because helpers would have increased the chances of survival of twins, and the presence of twins would have increased the benefits of helping. Finally, the high costs of raising twins and the variability of group compositions, especially the fact that some groups would not have had older offspring to serve as helpers, may have selected for facultative polyandry in saddle-back tamarins ( Saguinus fuscicollis ) and perhaps in other callitrichid species. Both helping and cooperative polyandry have been extensively studied in bird species, and I apply some of the conclusions of these studies to the discussion of the evolution of callitrichid social systems.en_US
dc.format.extent1285520 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; Plenum Publishing Corporation ; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherPolyandryen_US
dc.subject.otherAnthropology/Archaeometryen_US
dc.subject.otherHuman Geneticsen_US
dc.subject.otherLife Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherEvolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.otherCallitrichidsen_US
dc.subject.otherHelpingen_US
dc.subject.otherTwinningen_US
dc.subject.otherPaternal Careen_US
dc.titleA comparative perspective on the evolution of tamarin and marmoset social systemsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Anthropology, University of Michigan, 1054 LSA Building, 48109, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Zoology Department, University of Tasmania, G. P. O. Box 252C, 7001, Hobart, Tasmania, Australiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44556/1/10764_2005_Article_BF02193696.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02193696en_US
dc.identifier.sourceInternational Journal of Primatologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.