Show simple item record

Influence of Smoking Status on Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition–Related Improvement in Coronary Endothelial Function

dc.contributor.authorSchlaifer, Jay D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMancini, G. B. Johnen_US
dc.contributor.authorO'Neill, Blair J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPitt, Bertramen_US
dc.contributor.authorHaber, Harry E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPepine, Carl J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T14:58:52Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T14:58:52Z
dc.date.issued1999-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationSchlaifer, Jay D.; Mancini, G.B. John; O'Neill, Blair J.; Pitt, Bertram; Haber, Harry E.; Pepine, Carl J.; (1999). "Influence of Smoking Status on Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition–Related Improvement in Coronary Endothelial Function." Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy 13(3): 201-209. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44562>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0920-3206en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-7241en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44562
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=10439882&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractSummary. Our study evaluated the influence of smoking status on coronary endothelial function in normotensive patients with coronary artery disease who received placebo or the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor quinapril in the TREND study (Trial on Reversing Endothelial Dysfunction). In this retrospective analysis of data from the previously published study, patients were classified as either smokers (n = 23) or nonsmokers (n = 82). Patients underwent coronary angiography at baseline and again after 6 months follow-up. The primary response variable was the net change in acetylcholine-induced diameter of the target coronary artery segments (n = 105) between the baseline and 6-month follow-up angiograms. The secondary response variables were based on analysis of all segments (n = 300) and the mean diameter responses of target and all segments at 6 months. At baseline, coronary artery vasomotor responses were similar in smokers and nonsmokers in the placebo and quinapril groups. There was a significant improvement in the primary response variable for both smokers (P = 0.008) and nonsmokers (P = 0.047) randomized to quinapril compared with placebo. At 6 months follow-up, nonsmokers in the placebo group showed no significant change in the mean vasoconstrictor responses (8.3% vs. 8.0% at acetylcholine 10 -4 mol/L), whereas nonsmokers in the quinapril-treated group showed significantly less vasoconstriction (2.7% vs. 13.2%; P = 0.003). Among smokers in the placebo group, vasoconstriction increased nonsignificantly (21.7% vs. 17.2% at baseline) but decreased significantly in the quinapril group (0.5% vs. 17.9%; P = 0.002). These results indicate that ACE inhibition improves the coronary vasomotor response in both smokers and nonsmokers, but that smokers apparently derive greater benefit.en_US
dc.format.extent161245 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherMedicine & Public Healthen_US
dc.subject.otherCardiologyen_US
dc.subject.otherAcetylcholineen_US
dc.subject.otherAngiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibitionen_US
dc.subject.otherCoronary Diseaseen_US
dc.subject.otherEndotheliumen_US
dc.subject.otherSmokingen_US
dc.subject.otherVasoconstrictionen_US
dc.titleInfluence of Smoking Status on Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition–Related Improvement in Coronary Endothelial Functionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelChemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiological Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Floridaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canadaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canadaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherParke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Floridaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid10439882en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44562/1/10557_2004_Article_203634.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007740008155en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCardiovascular Drugs and Therapyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.