Show simple item record

Early Indicators of Autism Spectrum Disorders in the Second Year of Life

dc.contributor.authorWetherby, Amy M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWoods, Juliannen_US
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Lorien_US
dc.contributor.authorCleary, Julieen_US
dc.contributor.authorDickinson, Hollyen_US
dc.contributor.authorLord, Catherineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T15:03:51Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T15:03:51Z
dc.date.issued2004-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationWetherby, Amy M.; Woods, Juliann; Allen, Lori; Cleary, Julie; Dickinson, Holly; Lord, Catherine; (2004). "Early Indicators of Autism Spectrum Disorders in the Second Year of Life." Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 34(5): 473-493. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44624>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0162-3257en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-3432en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44624
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=15628603&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThree groups of 18 children were selected for this study, one group with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), one group with developmental delays in which ASD was ruled out (DD), and one group with typical development (TD), from a pool of 3026 children who were screened with the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile (CSBS DP, Wetherby & Prizant, 2002) Infant-Toddler Checklist under 24 months of age. The CSBS DP Behavior Sample was videotaped on selected children as a second-level evaluation during the second year of life. The Infant-Toddler Checklist had a sensitivity and specificity of 88.9% for this sample of children. Significant group differences were found on the Infant-Toddler Checklist and the Behavior Sample, however, these differences did not distinguish children with ASD and DD with high accuracy. The videotapes of the Behavior Sample were reanalyzed to identify red flags of ASD. Nine red flags differentiated children in the ASD group from both the DD and TD groups and four red flags differentiated children in the ASD Group from the TD group but not the DD group. These 13 red flags were found to discriminate the three groups with a correct classification rate of 94.4%.en_US
dc.format.extent218572 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherEarly Identificationen_US
dc.subject.otherNeuropsychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherCSBS DPen_US
dc.subject.otherClinical Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherPediatricsen_US
dc.subject.otherDevelopmental Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherAutismen_US
dc.subject.otherDevelopmental Delayen_US
dc.subject.otherScreeningen_US
dc.titleEarly Indicators of Autism Spectrum Disorders in the Second Year of Lifeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Worken_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychiatryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPediatricsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherFlorida State University, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherFlorida State University, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherFlorida State University, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherFlorida State University, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherFlorida State University, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid15628603en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44624/1/10803_2004_Article_492544.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-004-2544-yen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Autism and Developmental Disordersen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.