Show simple item record

Choice vs. Preference: The Effects of Choice and No Choice of Preferred and Non Preferred Spelling Tasks on the Academic Behavior of Students with Disabilities

dc.contributor.authorClare, Christine M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKillu, Kimen_US
dc.contributor.authorIm, Angelaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T15:17:51Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T15:17:51Z
dc.date.issued1999-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationKillu, Kim; Clare, Christine M.; Im, Angela; (1999). "Choice vs. Preference: The Effects of Choice and No Choice of Preferred and Non Preferred Spelling Tasks on the Academic Behavior of Students with Disabilities." Journal of Behavioral Education 9 (3-4): 239-253. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44806>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1053-0819en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-3513en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44806
dc.description.abstractThe effects of choice and no choice of preferred and non preferred instructional activities on the academic behavior of 3 students with disabilities were investigated. Participant preferences for spelling tasks were assessed and an ABCDEF design was used to examine choice and preference within 6 experimental conditions: a) choice of preferred tasks, b) choice of non preferred tasks, c) no choice of preferred tasks, d) no choice of non preferred tasks, e) no choice of preferred tasks (yoked-control), and f) no choice of non preferred tasks (yoked-control). Results indicate that all 3 participants had higher levels of task engagement when working with preferred tasks, regardless of a choice or no choice format. The findings from this investigation contribute to the growing body of research that focuses on developing interventions that are responsive to individual student preferences.en_US
dc.format.extent773418 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; Human Sciences Press, Inc. ; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherPedagogic Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherChoiceen_US
dc.subject.otherClinical Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherHealth Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychology of Personalityen_US
dc.subject.otherPreferenceen_US
dc.subject.otherTask Engagementen_US
dc.subject.otherSpellingen_US
dc.titleChoice vs. Preference: The Effects of Choice and No Choice of Preferred and Non Preferred Spelling Tasks on the Academic Behavior of Students with Disabilitiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Education, University of Michigan-Dearborn, Dearborn, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDearborn Public Schools, Dearborn, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherWestwoods Community Schools, Dearborn Heights, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusDearbornen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44806/1/10864_2004_Article_414373.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022143716509en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Behavioral Educationen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.