Show simple item record

Minimal Contact Intervention with Autologous BMT Patients: Impact on QOL and Emotional Distress

dc.contributor.authorTrask, Peter C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJones, Dawnen_US
dc.contributor.authorPaterson, Amber G.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T15:21:47Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T15:21:47Z
dc.date.issued2003-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationTrask, Peter C.; Jones, Dawn; Paterson, Amber G.; (2003). "Minimal Contact Intervention with Autologous BMT Patients: Impact on QOL and Emotional Distress." Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings 10(2): 109-117. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44854>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1068-9583en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-3572en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44854
dc.description.abstractBone marrow transplantation (BMT) is often a last treatment option for individuals who have experienced relapse or treatment failure and is often accompanied by increased levels of distress and reductions in quality of life (QOL). Despite this, few studies have been designed to improve post-BMT QOL and reduce distress. The current study examined the course of distress and QOL in 26 autologus BMT patients and the effect on distress and QOL of providing a minimal contact workbook intervention. Physical well-being decreased following the BMT, but increased at 2- and 6-month follow-up assessments, and distress did not significantly vary over the course of the study for patients in the standard care and workbook intervention groups. Examination of the reasons for the lack of group differences revealed that approximately half of the individuals randomized to the workbook intervention did not look at the material; with those that did reporting higher QOL, decreased anxiety, more adaptive coping, and decreased religiosity. The results argue for the importance of targeting patients at need prior to the transplant procedure, triaging them based on specific characteristics, and providing treatments that match these characteristics.en_US
dc.format.extent312674 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; Plenum Publishing Corporation ; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherClinical Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherEmotional Distressen_US
dc.subject.otherPublic Health/Gesundheitswesenen_US
dc.subject.otherHealth Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherAutologous Bone Marrow Transplanten_US
dc.subject.otherPsychological Interventionen_US
dc.titleMinimal Contact Intervention with Autologous BMT Patients: Impact on QOL and Emotional Distressen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychiatryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBehavioral Medicine Program, University of Michigan, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherKaplan & Kaplan Psychologists, Hamilton, Ontario, Canadaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44854/1/10880_2004_Article_464477.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023394005315en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settingsen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.