Show simple item record

Electroantennogram responses of Hyles lineata (Sphingidae: Lepidoptera) to volatile compounds from Clarkia breweri (Onagraceae) and other moth-pollinated flowers

dc.contributor.authorRaguso, Robert A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLight, Douglas M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPickersky, Eranen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T15:24:26Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T15:24:26Z
dc.date.issued1996-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationRaguso, Robert A.; Light, Douglas M.; Pickersky, Eran; (1996). "Electroantennogram responses of Hyles lineata (Sphingidae: Lepidoptera) to volatile compounds from Clarkia breweri (Onagraceae) and other moth-pollinated flowers." Journal of Chemical Ecology 22(10): 1735-1766. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44890>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-1561en_US
dc.identifier.issn0098-0331en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44890
dc.description.abstractElectroantennograms (EAGs) from field-collected Hyles lineata moths were recorded in response to 10 individual floral volatiles identified from Clarkia breweri (Onagraceae), to 22 scent compounds produced by other moth-pollinated flowers and to eight ubiquitous “green leaf volatiles.” Females' EAGs were generally 1.5- to 2-fold greater than those observed for male moths. Female:male EAG rank orders were significantly correlated, but marked differences in order were observed for some compounds (e.g., benzyl alcohol, cinnamic aldehyde, geraniol, and linalool). Linalool, benzyl acetate, methyl salicylate, and pyranoid linalool oxide elicited the largest EAG responses (−1.2 to −0.8 mV) among scent compounds from C. breweri . EAG responses were significantly lower for monoterpenes as a pooled compound class than for aromatic esters, alcohols and aldehydes, fatty acid derivatives, N-bearing compounds and oxygenated terpenoids. EAG responses to structurally related scent compounds were not significantly different in most cases. Both male and female H. lineata were sensitive to most C. breweri scent compounds at 10 −2 to 10 −4 µg/µl doses, and rank order in potency varied with the dose/concentration tested. H. lineata's olfactory sensitivity to diverse volatile compounds across a range of doses/concentrations suggests that a broad array of volatiles could function as floral attractants for foraging hawkmoths.en_US
dc.format.extent1554445 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; Plenum Publishing Corporation ; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherEcologyen_US
dc.subject.otherHyles Lineataen_US
dc.subject.otherAromaticsen_US
dc.subject.otherMonoterpenesen_US
dc.subject.otherGreen Leaf Volatilesen_US
dc.subject.otherFloral Attractionen_US
dc.subject.otherPhysical Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.otherLife Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherAgricultureen_US
dc.subject.otherBiological Microscopyen_US
dc.subject.otherEAGen_US
dc.subject.otherFloral Scenten_US
dc.subject.otherHawkmothsen_US
dc.subject.otherNitrogen-bearing Compoundsen_US
dc.subject.otherOlfactionen_US
dc.subject.otherSemiochemicalsen_US
dc.titleElectroantennogram responses of Hyles lineata (Sphingidae: Lepidoptera) to volatile compounds from Clarkia breweri (Onagraceae) and other moth-pollinated flowersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biology, University of Michigan, 48109-1048, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biology, University of Michigan, 48109-1048, Ann Arbor, Michigan; ARL Division of Neurobiology, University of Arizona, 611 Gould-Simpson Building, P. O. Box 210077, 85721-0077, Tucson, Arizonaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUSDA-ARS Western Regional Research Center, 800 Buchanan St., 94710, Albany, Californiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid24227106en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44890/1/10886_2005_Article_BF02028502.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02028502en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Chemical Ecologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.