Show simple item record

Gut-Based Antioxidant Enzymes in a Polyphagous and a Graminivorous Grasshopper

dc.contributor.authorBarbehenn, Raymond V.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T15:24:52Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T15:24:52Z
dc.date.issued2002-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationBarbehenn, Raymond V.; (2002). "Gut-Based Antioxidant Enzymes in a Polyphagous and a Graminivorous Grasshopper." Journal of Chemical Ecology 28(7): 1329-1347. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44896>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-1561en_US
dc.identifier.issn0098-0331en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44896
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=12199499&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractGraminivorous species of grasshoppers develop lethal lesions in their midgut epithelia when they ingest tannic acid, whereas polyphagous grass- hoppers are unaffected by ingested tannins. This study tests the hypothesis that polyphagous species are defended by higher activities of antioxidant enzymes (constitutive or inducible) in their guts than are graminivorous species. Comparisons were made between four antioxidant enzymes: superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APOX), and glutathione transferase peroxidase (GSTPX). Enzyme activities were measured in the gut lumens and midgut tissues of Melanoplus sanguinipes (polyphagous) and Aulocara ellioti (graminivorous). The results of this study do not support the hypothesis that M. sanguinipes is better defended by antioxidant enzymes than is A. ellioti , nor are these enzymes more inducible in M. sanguinipes than in A. ellioti when insects consume food containing 15% dry weight tannic acid. Instead, tannic acid consumption reduced SOD, APOX, and GSTPX activities in both species. This study reports the first evidence that SOD is secreted into the midgut lumen in insects, with activities two- to fourfold higher than those found in midgut tissues. The spatial distribution of GSTPX and APOX activities observed in both species suggests that ingested plant antioxidant enzymes may function as acquired defenses in grasshoppers. In addition, the results of this study permit the first comparison between the antioxidant enzyme defenses of Orthoptera and Lepidoptera. Most notably, grasshoppers have higher SOD activities than caterpillars, but completely lack APOX in their midgut tissues.en_US
dc.format.extent74758 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; Plenum Publishing Corporation ; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherPhysical Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.otherMelanoplusen_US
dc.subject.otherGlutathione Transferase Peroxidaseen_US
dc.subject.otherCatalaseen_US
dc.subject.otherAcrididaeen_US
dc.subject.otherEcologyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherAgricultureen_US
dc.subject.otherBiological Microscopyen_US
dc.subject.otherGrasshopperen_US
dc.subject.otherOrthopteraen_US
dc.subject.otherGraminivorousen_US
dc.subject.otherPolyphagousen_US
dc.subject.otherHerbivoreen_US
dc.subject.otherAulocaraen_US
dc.subject.otherAntioxidant Enzymeen_US
dc.subject.otherSuperoxide Dismutaseen_US
dc.subject.otherAscorbate Peroxidaseen_US
dc.titleGut-Based Antioxidant Enzymes in a Polyphagous and a Graminivorous Grasshopperen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-1048en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid12199499en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44896/1/10886_2004_Article_374128.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1016288201110en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Chemical Ecologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.