Show simple item record

The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Robbed: Inequality in U.S. Criminal Victimization, 1974–2000

dc.contributor.authorThacher, Daviden_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T15:41:09Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T15:41:09Z
dc.date.issued2004-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationThacher, David; (2004). "The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Robbed: Inequality in U.S. Criminal Victimization, 1974–2000." Journal of Quantitative Criminology 20(2): 89-116. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45111>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0748-4518en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-7799en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45111
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates inequality in criminal victimization in the United States over the past quarter century. By analyzing data from the National Crime Victimization Survey, it shows that the crime drop since the early 1970s has benefited upper-income households much more than the poor, so that criminal victimization has become more concentrated among the poor (particularly in the area of nonstranger violence). The paper then decomposes this trend statistically in order to investigate factors that may explain it. That analysis finds that demographic changes in each quintile explain a significant share of the growing concentration of criminal victimization among the poor.en_US
dc.format.extent198080 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; Plenum Publishing Corporation ; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherSocial Sciences, Generalen_US
dc.subject.otherInequalityen_US
dc.subject.otherDemographic Changeen_US
dc.subject.otherSociologyen_US
dc.subject.otherStatistics, Generalen_US
dc.subject.otherCriminologyen_US
dc.subject.otherMethodology of the Social Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherCrime Victimizationen_US
dc.subject.otherStratificationen_US
dc.titleThe Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Robbed: Inequality in U.S. Criminal Victimization, 1974–2000en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelLaw and Legal Studiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelGovernment, Politics and Lawen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumGerald R. Ford School of Public Policy and A. Alfred Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45111/1/10940_2004_Article_483640.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:JOQC.0000029090.28541.4fen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Quantitative Criminologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.