Show simple item record

Is It Bad to Be Good? An Exploration of Aggressive and Prosocial Behavior Subtypes in Adolescence

dc.contributor.authorBoxer, Paulen_US
dc.contributor.authorTisak, Marie S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGoldstein, Sara E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T15:53:55Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T15:53:55Z
dc.date.issued2004-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationBoxer, Paul; Tisak, Marie S.; Goldstein, Sara E.; (2004). "Is It Bad to Be Good? An Exploration of Aggressive and Prosocial Behavior Subtypes in Adolescence." Journal of Youth and Adolescence 33(2): 91-100. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45296>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0047-2891en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-6601en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45296
dc.description.abstractResearch in aggressive behavior development has distinguished between proactive (i.e., intended to achieve an instrumental goal) and reactive (i.e., emitted as an emotional response to provocation) subtypes of aggression. A similar distinction has not been made with regard to prosocial behavior. In this study, subtypes of both aggressive and prosocial behavior and their relation to aggression-supporting social cognitions were examined in a sample of 250 early and middle adolescents. Adolescents completed behavior rating scales and a measure of their beliefs about the acceptability of responding aggressively. Principal components analysis identified 3 subtypes of aggressive and prosocial behavior: aggressive, prosocial, and proactive prosocial. Proactive prosocial behavior was positively correlated with aggression and aggression-supporting beliefs, while other prosocial behavior was negatively correlated with these constructs. Findings are discussed in the context of aggressive behavior development and with regard to traditional views of prosocial behavior as altruistic.en_US
dc.format.extent60444 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; Plenum Publishing Corporation ; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherClinical Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherDevelopmental Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherAggressionen_US
dc.subject.otherNormative/Acceptability Beliefsen_US
dc.subject.otherProsocial Behavioren_US
dc.subject.otherPsychiatryen_US
dc.titleIs It Bad to Be Good? An Exploration of Aggressive and Prosocial Behavior Subtypes in Adolescenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Worken_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumAggression Research Program, Research Center for Group Dynamics, University of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumGender and Achievement Research Program, Institute for Research on Women and Gender, University of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBowling Green State University, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45296/1/10964_2004_Article_478822.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:JOYO.0000013421.02015.efen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Youth and Adolescenceen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.