Social science in court
dc.contributor.author | Lempert, Richard O. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-09-11T15:54:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-09-11T15:54:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1986-06 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Lempert, Richard O.; (1986). "Social science in court." Law and Human Behavior 10 (1-2): 167-181. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45308> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1573-661X | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0147-7307 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45308 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article discusses the role of social science in legal proceedings with special attention to the ethical situation of the expert psychologist asked to testify about the reliability of an eyewitness identification. It argues that in this area as in others one cannot discuss the ethics of expert psychological testimony without attending to the quality of the research and theory on which the testimony is based. It also identifies as considerations that bear on the propriety of such testimony the information the fact finder is likely to receive in its absence and the factual guilt of the defendant. The paper goes on to discuss the relationship between law and social science more generally. It argues that ultimately courts do and should have the last word regarding the place of social science in legal proceedings. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 1187902 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3115 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; Plenum Publishing Corporation ; Springer Science+Business Media | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Social Psychology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Psychology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Criminology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Community & Environmental Psychology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Psychology and Law | en_US |
dc.title | Social science in court | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Law and Legal Studies | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Government, Politics and Law | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | University of Michigan, Michigan, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45308/1/10979_2005_Article_BF01044567.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01044567 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Law and Human Behavior | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.