Show simple item record

To tell what we know or wait for Godot?

dc.contributor.authorEllsworth, Phoebe C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T15:54:46Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T15:54:46Z
dc.date.issued1991-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationEllsworth, Phoebe C.; (1991). "To tell what we know or wait for Godot?." Law and Human Behavior 15(1): 77-90. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45309>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0147-7307en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-661Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45309
dc.description.abstractThe evidence that death-qualified jurors are more likely than excluded jurors to convict is consistent, robust, and directly relevant to the issues of representativeness and conviction proneness that were before the Supreme Court in Lockhart v. McCree . There are exactly the circumstances in which an amicus brief from the APA is most appropriate. In science the search for knowledge is never complete; to keep silent until our understanding is perfect is to keep silent forever.en_US
dc.format.extent1060305 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; Plenum Publishing Corporation ; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychology and Lawen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherCriminologyen_US
dc.subject.otherSocial Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherCommunity & Environmental Psychologyen_US
dc.titleTo tell what we know or wait for Godot?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelLaw and Legal Studiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelGovernment, Politics and Lawen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationum5242 Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 48106, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45309/1/10979_2005_Article_BF01044831.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01044831en_US
dc.identifier.sourceLaw and Human Behavioren_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.