Show simple item record

Integrating Vocational Services on Case Management Teams: Outcomes from a Research Demonstration Project

dc.contributor.authorCollins, Mary E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMowbray, Carol T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBybee, Deborah I.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T15:57:58Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T15:57:58Z
dc.date.issued2000-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationMowbray, Carol T.; Bybee, Deborah; Collins, Mary E.; (2000). "Integrating Vocational Services on Case Management Teams: Outcomes from a Research Demonstration Project." Mental Health Services Research 2(1): 51-66. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45357>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-6636en_US
dc.identifier.issn1522-3434en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45357
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=11254070&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractRecent innovations to improve employment rates among persons with psychiatric disabilities include “hybrid case management/employment services.” Project WINS was a research/demonstration project which integrated specialized vocational services into case management teams. In this report, client outcomes of WINS involvement are evaluated, using a quasiexperimental, longitudinal design. On almost all the work-related variables, participants in the immediate and delayed treatment conditions displayed better outcomes than those in the control condition, as did individuals receiving moderate or substantial service versus no/minimal services. To address possible selection bias due to the quasiexperimental nature of the design, further analyses used baseline differences across conditions and participation levels as covariates. Results of multivariate analyses showed some anomalous findings regarding significant positive effects for the delayed, but not the immediate treatment condition versus the no-treatment control group. However, in similar analyses involving participation level as the independent variable, a moderate or substantial amount of service increased the odds of working by almost five times and also positively affected three other work-related variables. While limitations of this quasiexperimental design are noted, the results appear promising enough to support replications of WINS.en_US
dc.format.extent104354 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; Plenum Publishing Corporation ; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherAssertive Community Treatmenten_US
dc.subject.otherPsychiatric Disabilitiesen_US
dc.subject.otherMedicine & Public Healthen_US
dc.subject.otherPublic Health/Gesundheitswesenen_US
dc.subject.otherCase Managementen_US
dc.subject.otherVocational Rehabilitationen_US
dc.subject.otherService Integrationen_US
dc.subject.otherMental Health Services Researchen_US
dc.titleIntegrating Vocational Services on Case Management Teams: Outcomes from a Research Demonstration Projecten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychiatryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSchool of Social Work, Boston University, Boston, Massachusettsen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid11254070en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45357/1/11020_2004_Article_223795.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010195908769en_US
dc.identifier.sourceMental Health Services Researchen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.