Show simple item record

State legislation on smoking and health: A comparison of two policies

dc.contributor.authorWarner, Kenneth E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T16:03:56Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T16:03:56Z
dc.date.issued1981-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationWarner, Kenneth E.; (1981). "State legislation on smoking and health: A comparison of two policies." Policy Sciences 13(2): 139-152. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45442>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0032-2687en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-0891en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45442
dc.description.abstractThe two principal smoking-related state legislative activities stand in sharp contrast to one another. Cigarette excise taxation diffused among the states well before the connection between smoking and illness became a public issue, yet more recent tax increases appear to reflect a response to the national anti-smoking campaign. The growing disparity in cigarette prices between tobacco and other states has created a lucrative market in bootlegged cigarettes and has thereby brought new taxation to a virtual standstill for six years. Laws restricting smoking in public places represent a phenomenon of the 1970's clearly bearing the imprint of the anti-smoking campaign. From 1972 through 1978, the number of states with such laws in effect grew from 5 to 36, and the restrictiveness of the laws also increased. The dramatic correlation between diffusion of the laws and decreases in cigarette consumption rates seems best interpreted as each of these reflecting changes in social attitudes toward smoking.en_US
dc.format.extent794560 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherSocial Sciences, Generalen_US
dc.subject.otherEconomic Policyen_US
dc.subject.otherPolitical Scienceen_US
dc.titleState legislation on smoking and health: A comparison of two policiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Health Planning and Administration, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 48109, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45442/1/11077_2004_Article_BF00136006.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00136006en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePolicy Sciencesen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.