Party identification and party closeness in comparative perspective
dc.contributor.author | Inglehart, Ronald F. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Jennings, M. Kent | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Barnes, Samuel H. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Farah, Barbara | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-09-11T16:06:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-09-11T16:06:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1988-09 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Barnes, Samuel H.; Jennings, M. Kent; Inglehart, Ronald; Farah, Barbara; (1988). "Party identification and party closeness in comparative perspective." Political Behavior 10(3): 215-231. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45482> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0190-9320 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1573-6687 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45482 | |
dc.description.abstract | The present analysis uses data from 1974 and 1981 U. S. cross sections, which incorporate a panel, to compare the standard NES measure of party identification (ID) with a measure of partisanship derived from a party closeness question widely employed in cross-national research. Important features of the two scales are examined by transforming the closeness measure into a scale of very close, fairly close, not very close, and no preference corresponding to the seven-point ID scale. The scales are highly correlated and are similar in their reliability. More than 75% of the “independents” in the ID scale choose a party in the closeness version, and over half of these select the “fairly close” category. Respondents do not volunteer that they are independents when that alternative is not stated in the question. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 1187299 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3115 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Kluwer Academic Publishers; Agathon Press, Inc. ; Springer Science+Business Media | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Social Sciences, General | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Political Science | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Sociology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Political Psychology | en_US |
dc.title | Party identification and party closeness in comparative perspective | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Political Science | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | 4010 Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 48106, Ann Arbor, MI | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | 4010 Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 48106, Ann Arbor, MI | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | 4010 Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 48106, Ann Arbor, MI | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | The New York Times, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45482/1/11109_2004_Article_BF00990552.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00990552 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Political Behavior | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.