Show simple item record

Congressional campaign effects on candidate recognition and evaluation

dc.contributor.authorGoldenberg, Edie N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTraugott, Michael W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T16:07:17Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T16:07:17Z
dc.date.issued1980-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationGoldenberg, Edie N.; Traugott, Michael W.; (1980). "Congressional campaign effects on candidate recognition and evaluation." Political Behavior 2(1): 61-90. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45489>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0190-9320en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-6687en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45489
dc.description.abstractTo date, most congressional scholars have relied upon a standard model of American electoral behavior developed in the presidential setting. This research extends our knowledge of Congressmen's incumbency advantages and their sources. Candidate preference is viewed as a function of the relative recognition and evaluation of incumbents and their challengers, as well as of Democrats and Republicans. In the recognition model, contact with voters and media effects are quite important, but there is no direct role for party identification. Evaluation is a function of personal contact and party identification, and media variables are insignificant. Relative recognition, relative evaluation, and party identification are three important predictors of candidate preference, and incumbency itself adds little beyond what is contained in incumbent recognition and evaluation advantages.en_US
dc.format.extent1735890 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Agathon Press, Inc. ; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherPolitical Scienceen_US
dc.subject.otherSocial Sciences, Generalen_US
dc.subject.otherSociologyen_US
dc.subject.otherPolitical Psychologyen_US
dc.titleCongressional campaign effects on candidate recognition and evaluationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPolitical Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for Political Studies, The University of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for Political Studies, The University of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45489/1/11109_2004_Article_BF00989756.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00989756en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePolitical Behavioren_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.