Congressional campaign effects on candidate recognition and evaluation
dc.contributor.author | Goldenberg, Edie N. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Traugott, Michael W. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-09-11T16:07:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-09-11T16:07:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1980-03 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Goldenberg, Edie N.; Traugott, Michael W.; (1980). "Congressional campaign effects on candidate recognition and evaluation." Political Behavior 2(1): 61-90. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45489> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0190-9320 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1573-6687 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45489 | |
dc.description.abstract | To date, most congressional scholars have relied upon a standard model of American electoral behavior developed in the presidential setting. This research extends our knowledge of Congressmen's incumbency advantages and their sources. Candidate preference is viewed as a function of the relative recognition and evaluation of incumbents and their challengers, as well as of Democrats and Republicans. In the recognition model, contact with voters and media effects are quite important, but there is no direct role for party identification. Evaluation is a function of personal contact and party identification, and media variables are insignificant. Relative recognition, relative evaluation, and party identification are three important predictors of candidate preference, and incumbency itself adds little beyond what is contained in incumbent recognition and evaluation advantages. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 1735890 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3115 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Kluwer Academic Publishers; Agathon Press, Inc. ; Springer Science+Business Media | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Political Science | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Social Sciences, General | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Sociology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Political Psychology | en_US |
dc.title | Congressional campaign effects on candidate recognition and evaluation | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Political Science | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Center for Political Studies, The University of Michigan, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Center for Political Studies, The University of Michigan, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45489/1/11109_2004_Article_BF00989756.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00989756 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Political Behavior | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.