Show simple item record

Gender differences in best friendships

dc.contributor.authorElkins, Leigh E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPeterson, Christopheren_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T16:15:08Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T16:15:08Z
dc.date.issued1993-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationElkins, Leigh E.; Peterson, Christopher; (1993). "Gender differences in best friendships." Sex Roles 29 (7-8): 497-508. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45601>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-2762en_US
dc.identifier.issn0360-0025en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45601
dc.description.abstractPrior investigations of friendship patterns have reported gender differences, with women's same-gender friendships tending to be richer and having a possible therapeutic value, as compared to those of men. Compared to same-gender best friendships, opposite-gender best friendships have been described as less fulfilling for women and more fulfilling for men. The present study explored such differences more fully in a sample of 65 female and 58 male predominantly white college students. Subjects completed four modified versions of P. H. Wright's [(1985) “The Acquaintance Description Form,” In S. F. Duck and D. Pearlman (Eds.), Understanding Personal Relationships: An Interdisciplinarian Approach, London: Sage] Acquaintance Description Form, describing their actual and ideal same-gender best friendships and their actual and ideal opposite-gender best friendships. They also responded to several measures of dysphoria. In the present study, the lowest scores for the friendship scales were reported by male subjects describing same-gender friendships, both ideal and actual. For both male and female subjects, dysphoria was positively correlated with a discrepancy between ideal and actual friendships with same-gender or opposite-gender individuals.en_US
dc.format.extent623082 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; Plenum Publishing Corporation ; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherSocial Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherSociologyen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherInterdisciplinary Studiesen_US
dc.subject.otherAnthropology/Archaeometryen_US
dc.subject.otherDevelopmental Psychologyen_US
dc.titleGender differences in best friendshipsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelWomen's and Gender Studiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanitiesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, 580 Union Drive, 48109-1346, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherVanderbilt University, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45601/1/11199_2004_Article_BF00289323.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00289323en_US
dc.identifier.sourceSex Rolesen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.