Show simple item record

Gender-Role Cognition in Three-Year-Old Boys and Girls

dc.contributor.authorHruda, Ludmila Z.en_US
dc.contributor.authorO'Brien, Marionen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeyton, Vickien_US
dc.contributor.authorMistry, Rashmita S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, Anneen_US
dc.contributor.authorCaldera, Yvonneen_US
dc.contributor.authorHuston, Aletha C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRoy, Carolynen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T16:16:15Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T16:16:15Z
dc.date.issued2000-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationO'Brien, Marion; Peyton, Vicki; Mistry, Rashmita; Hruda, Ludmila; Jacobs, Anne; Caldera, Yvonne; Huston, Aletha; Roy, Carolyn; (2000). "Gender-Role Cognition in Three-Year-Old Boys and Girls." Sex Roles 42 (11-12): 1007-1025. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45617>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-2762en_US
dc.identifier.issn0360-0025en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45617
dc.description.abstractAlthough the multidimensionality of gender roles has been well established, few researchers have investigated male and female roles separately. Because of the substantial differences in the ways male and female roles are portrayed in our culture, boys and girls may think and learn about these roles differently. The male role is more clearly defined, more highly valued, and more salient than the female role; thus, children's cognitions about these two roles may be expected to differ. The present study addressed the question of whether there is sex-typical variation in gender labeling, gender-role knowledge, and schematicity. Participants were 120 families; 15% were from minority ethnic groups, and 17% were single-parent families; 25% of the parents had a high school education or less. Results indicated that at 36 months of age, boys were less able to label gender and less knowledgeable about gender roles than were girls. Boys' knew more about male stereotypes than female stereotypes, whereas girls knew considerably more than boys about the female role and as much as boys about the male role. Boys and girls were found to be similar in gender schematicity. Traditionality of parental attitudes regarding child-rearing and maternal employment were not strongly related to children's gender cognition.en_US
dc.format.extent90058 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; Plenum Publishing Corporation ; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherSociologyen_US
dc.subject.otherSocial Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherInterdisciplinary Studiesen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherAnthropology/Archaeometryen_US
dc.subject.otherDevelopmental Psychologyen_US
dc.titleGender-Role Cognition in Three-Year-Old Boys and Girlsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelWomen's and Gender Studiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanitiesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Kansas, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Kansas, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texasen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Kansas, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Kansas, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of North Carolina Center for Developmental Science, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherTexas Tech University, Lubbock, Texasen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45617/1/11199_2004_Article_226122.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007036600980en_US
dc.identifier.sourceSex Rolesen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.