Show simple item record

The status of women: Conceptual and methodological issues in demographic studies

dc.contributor.authorMason, Karen Oppenheimen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T16:18:36Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T16:18:36Z
dc.date.issued1986-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationMason, Karen Oppenheim; (1986). "The status of women: Conceptual and methodological issues in demographic studies." Sociological Forum 1(2): 284-300. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45651>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-7861en_US
dc.identifier.issn0884-8971en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45651
dc.description.abstractThis paper explores several conceptual problems in social demographic studies of the status of women, including failure to recognize the multidimensionality of women's status and its variation across social “locations,” the confounding of gender and class stratification systems, and the confounding of access to resources with their control. Also discussed are some generic problems in the measurement of female status, such as the sensitivity of particular indicators to social context, and the need to select consistent comparisons when judging the extent of gender inequality.en_US
dc.format.extent1162093 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Eastern Sociological Society ; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherSocial Issuesen_US
dc.subject.otherSocial Sciences, Generalen_US
dc.subject.otherSociologyen_US
dc.titleThe status of women: Conceptual and methodological issues in demographic studiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSociologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45651/1/11206_2005_Article_BF01115740.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01115740en_US
dc.identifier.sourceSociological Forumen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.