The Pitfalls of International Integration: A Comment on the Bush Proposal and its Aftermath
dc.contributor.author | Avi-Yonah, Reuven S. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-09-11T17:22:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-09-11T17:22:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Avi-Yonah, Reuven S.; (2005). "The Pitfalls of International Integration: A Comment on the Bush Proposal and its Aftermath." International Tax and Public Finance 12(1): 87-95. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46092> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0927-5940 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1573-6970 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46092 | |
dc.description.abstract | In January 2003, the Bush Administration proposed a new system for taxing corporate dividends, under which domestic shareholders in U.S. corporations would not be taxed on dividends they received, provided the corporation distributed these dividends out of after-tax earnings (the “Bush Proposal”). The Bush Proposal was introduced in Congress on February 27, 2003. Ultimately, however, Congress balked at enacting full-fledged dividend exemption. Instead, in the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 (“JGTRRA”) as enacted on May 28, 2003, a lower rate of 15% was adopted for dividends paid by domestic and certain foreign corporations, 1 and the capital gains rate was likewise reduced to 15%. Significantly and in stark contrast to the original Bush proposal, under JGTRRA the lower rate for dividends and capital gains does not depend on any tax being paid at the corporate level. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 128780 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3115 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Kluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Economics / Management Science | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Public Finance & Economics | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Business Taxation | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Finance /Banking | en_US |
dc.subject.other | International Taxation | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Integration | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Dividends | en_US |
dc.title | The Pitfalls of International Integration: A Comment on the Bush Proposal and its Aftermath | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Political Science | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Government, Politics and Law | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | The University of Michigan Law School, 625 S. State Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109 | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/46092/1/10797_2005_Article_6397.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10797-005-6397-x | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | International Tax and Public Finance | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.