Show simple item record

Short-term effects of marijuana smoking on cognitive behavior in experienced male users

dc.contributor.authorDomino, Edward F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRennick, Phillipen_US
dc.contributor.authorPearl, Joseph H.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T17:43:20Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T17:43:20Z
dc.date.issued1973-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationPearl, Joseph H.; Domino, Edward F.; Rennick, Phillip; (1973). "Short-term effects of marijuana smoking on cognitive behavior in experienced male users." Psychopharmacologia 31(1): 13-24. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46387>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0033-3158en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-2072en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46387
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=4578718&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThe effects of smoking marijuana on the ability to use abstract concepts was tested in 12 experienced marijuana users. Each subject was tested three times, after smoking prepared 300 mg cigarettes containing either 0, 1.5 or 2.9% δ 9 -THC in different sessions according to a Latin Square design. The same number of whole and/or partial cigarettes was smoked by each subject in each of the three sessions. This was determined for individual subjects by the number of 2.9% δ 9 -THC marijuana cigarettes that the subject had been willing to smoke in a pre-experimental session up to a maximum of 1200 mg. The following tests of concept formation and usage were used: 1. a letter series test; 2. a word grouping test; 3. a conceptual clustering memory test; 4. a closure speed test; 5. Witkin's Embedded Figures Test; 6. a size weight illusion test; 7. Luchin's Water Jar Test; 8. Luchin's Hidden Word Test; and 9. an anagram test. Marijuana smoking led to a dose-related impairment on the letter series, word grouping, closure speed, and Embedded Figures test. Performance on the size-weight illusion, Luchin's Water Jar, Luchin's Hidden Word, and the anagram tests were unaffected. Conceptual clustering decreased after marijuana smoking. In most cases only the differences between 0 and 2.9% δ 9 -THC marijuana were statistically significant.en_US
dc.format.extent818621 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychiatryen_US
dc.subject.otherBiomedicineen_US
dc.subject.otherMarijuanaen_US
dc.subject.otherPharmacology/Toxicologyen_US
dc.subject.otherCognitive Behavioren_US
dc.subject.otherSmokingen_US
dc.titleShort-term effects of marijuana smoking on cognitive behavior in experienced male usersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychiatryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelChemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiological Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMichigan Neuropsychopharmacology Research Program, Lafayette Clinic, 48207, Detroit; University of Michigan, 48104, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMichigan Neuropsychopharmacology Research Program, Lafayette Clinic, 48207, Detroit; University of Michigan, 48104, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Educational Psychology, Oklahoma State University, 74074, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMichigan Neuropsychopharmacology Research Program, Lafayette Clinic, 48207, Detroit; University of Michigan, 48104, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid4578718en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/46387/1/213_2004_Article_BF00429295.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00429295en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePsychopharmacologiaen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.